Rent and Eviction Controls on the November Ballot in Six Bay Area Cities
From an economist's perspective, rent control is a loser. That's the thrust of a comprehensive piece on Bay Area rent and eviction control ballot measures by Kathleen Pender, San Francisco Chronicle business columnist (as well as a Planetizen blog post last year by Michael Lewyn).
Pender presents surveys and studies that back-up that perspective. The onus of maintaining affordability for regulated buildings is placed on landlords and newer tenants without doing anything to address the greater problem, lack of housing supply.
At the same time, it's easy to understand why these measures get on the ballot in the Bay Area.
Since 2010, the average asking rent for units of all sizes in the nine-county Bay Area has risen by roughly $1,000, or 66 percent, to $2,504, according to Novato research firm Real Answers.
And then there are the egregious examples of rent increases and evictions that occur in many of the region's communities. For example, the plight of a 97-year-old Burlingame resident (see 'Measure R' below) served a 60-day eviction notice after living in her rental for 66 years was reported in the Daily Mail (United Kingdom) on Feb. 24. On March 6, the paper reported she died.
What's particularly helpful is that Pender explains California legislation that places limits on the protections that ballot measures can seek.
For example, renters living in 21-year old or newer apartment buildings "and all single-family home and condos" can not be protected by rent control measures per the Costa-Hawkins Rental Housing Act [PDF-Calif. Apartment Association].
It also said that when tenants voluntarily vacate a rent-controlled unit, owners can charge the next tenant market rates, but after that it becomes subject to the annual rent control limit.
However, all rentals, regardless of age and building type, are not exempt from eviction control measures placed on the ballot, allowing "cities to limit evictions to specified just causes, including those allowed under a 1985 law known as the Ellis Act," writes Pender, though some of the below measures "also exempt single-family homes and newer condos from eviction controls."
- Alameda County [PDF]: Alameda: Measures L1, a city council initiative and M1, a voter initiative
- Oakland — Measure JJ, a city council initiative
- Contra Costa County [PDF]: Richmond — Measure L, a city council initiative
- San Mateo County: Burlingame — Measure R, voter initiative
- San Mateo — Measure Q, voter initiative
- Santa Clara County [PDF]: Mountain View — Measures V, a voter initiative, and W, a city council initiative
Pender describes the basics of each of the above ballot measures.
Related Planetizen posts:
- On the Bay Area's Peninsula: A Reborn Tenants' Rights Movement, June 13, 2016.
Housing Crisis Leads to Renewed Support For Rent Control, June 1, 2016
The Economics of Rent Control (blog), September 21, 2015
Reconsidering Rent Control, April 4, 2015
- Government / Politics
- Alameda County
- Bay Area
- Contra Costa County
- Mountain View
- Richmond (Calif.)
- San Mateo
- San Mateo County
- Santa Clara County
- 2016 Campaign
- California Legislation
- Costa-Hawkins Rental Housing Act
- Ellis Act
- Eviction Laws
- Rent Control
- Kathleen Pender