New Report Recommends Tough Medicine to Fix Bay Area's Housing Ailments
As the title of the Bay Area Council report indicates, the “Roadmap for Economic Resilience” is about keeping the Bay Area a "global economic powerhouse." It's biggest threat is from within—by not addressing challenges as a region.
"The need is perhaps most visible in the housing crisis that has become one of San Francisco’s most contentious issues," writes David R. Baker, energy and clean tech reporter for the San Francisco Chronicle.
For years, the region has not been building enough housing, said Jim Wunderman, President and CEO of the Bay Area Council. Some cities have actively encouraged new housing while others have tried to shut it out. Unaffordable prices are the result.
“The core issue is under-supply,” Wunderman said.
"But the report’s prescriptions for solving the crisis would be difficult to carry out, in part because they would require cities to give up some of their power," writes Baker
For example, regional planners already set goals for the number of housing units each Bay Area city should build, goals that many cities routinely ignore. The report recommends punishing cities that don’t meet the targets, perhaps by stripping them of the ability to approve or reject development projects.
BAC is not the first to recommend a stern approach to cities refusing to do their "fair share." "Renters' advocates in San Francisco are building a political and fundraising base to legally challenge suburbs that aren't pulling their weight in constructing the housing to meet the demands of population growth," wrote Planetizen managing editor James Brasuell in September.
An alternative approach would "expand 'by right' approval for housing," writes Baker. "If a proposed housing project complied with local zoning and building codes, no city would be able to block it." See by-right housing, "in which certain multifamily housing are designated a permitted use" (California Government Code Section 65589.4).
Hat tip: MTC-ABAG Library