A new report by the Bay Area Council argues that the regionwide housing crisis demands a regionwide response, i.e., all nine counties and 101 cities need to build more housing, and if they don't, there needs to be consequences.
As the title of the Bay Area Council report indicates, the “Roadmap for Economic Resilience” is about keeping the Bay Area a "global economic powerhouse." It's biggest threat is from within—by not addressing challenges as a region.
"The need is perhaps most visible in the housing crisis that has become one of San Francisco’s most contentious issues," writes David R. Baker, energy and clean tech reporter for the San Francisco Chronicle.
For years, the region has not been building enough housing, said Jim Wunderman, President and CEO of the Bay Area Council. Some cities have actively encouraged new housing while others have tried to shut it out. Unaffordable prices are the result.
“The core issue is under-supply,” Wunderman said.
"But the report’s prescriptions for solving the crisis would be difficult to carry out, in part because they would require cities to give up some of their power," writes Baker
For example, regional planners already set goals for the number of housing units each Bay Area city should build, goals that many cities routinely ignore. The report recommends punishing cities that don’t meet the targets, perhaps by stripping them of the ability to approve or reject development projects.
BAC is not the first to recommend a stern approach to cities refusing to do their "fair share." "Renters' advocates in San Francisco are building a political and fundraising base to legally challenge suburbs that aren't pulling their weight in constructing the housing to meet the demands of population growth," wrote Planetizen managing editor James Brasuell in September.
An alternative approach would "expand 'by right' approval for housing," writes Baker. "If a proposed housing project complied with local zoning and building codes, no city would be able to block it." See by-right housing, "in which certain multifamily housing are designated a permitted use" (California Government Code Section 65589.4).
The report also looks at other regional issues such as transportation, recommending "establishing a regional gasoline tax, sales tax or vehicle license fee (VLF)," adds Baker.
Hat tip: MTC-ABAG Library
Read the full story: Bay Area group’s housing solution: Punish cities that don’t build
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
California plans to bury El Niño’s downpour
If the state plays its cards right, it may be able to store a billion acre-feet of El Niño’s water in aquifers.
Chicago breaks ground on $3 billion megadevelopment
The new neighborhood, titled Foundry Park, will one day host 3,700 residences.
Satanic place names
From streams and lakes to valleys and canyons, I mapped more than 1,000 places named after the Devil.
California High-Speed Rail Authority CEO resigns after $600,000 scandal
Under Ian Choudri, the authority used taxpayer dollars to fund first class flights and trips to nightclubs.
Want to study the Missouri River? Soon, you may need unanimous approval from 10 states
Legislation would require 10 governors’ permission to study or build projects moving water outside the basin.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
City of Rosemead
Rutgers University, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy
One Hundred Miles
Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY)
The Architects Foundation
University of Cincinnati Online
City of Cambridge
Montrose County
The Pocatello Development Authority