The current patch bill funding highway and transit spending expires on Oct. 29. The House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee has released a multi-year bill called the Surface Transportation Reauthorization & Reform Act of 2015 (STRR Act).
"The House is planning to mark up a long-term transportation funding bill on Oct. 22, just days before the scheduled expiration of the nation's infrastructure spending," writes Keith Laing for The Hill. "The panel's chairman, Rep. Bill Shuster (R-Pa.), said the hearing will give lawmakers a chance to weigh on a multi-year extension of the transportation funding measure."
The current extension expires on Oct. 29, though a post last month indicated that highway and transit funding may last through June. However, a bill is needed to reauthorize the Highway Transportation Fund regardless of current funding levels.
The House bill is called the "The Surface Transportation Reauthorization & Reform Act of 2015 (STRR Act)," a 14-page document released on Oct. 14. It doesn't indicate the time period it covers, other than being called a "multi-year" bill, and doesn't indicate funding levels.
The bill "(c)onverts the Surface Transportation Program (STP) to a block grant program;" rolls the Transportation Alternatives Program (e.g., biking and walking projects into STP, "allowing 50 percent of transportation alternatives funding in urbanized areas to be used on any STP-eligible project; (i)ncreases funding for railway-highway grade crossings, and (b)ans the use of funding for automated traffic enforcement systems."
Under the "Reform" section, the bill "(s)treamlines the environmental review and permitting process to cut red tape and accelerate project delivery."
- Eliminates duplicative regulatory processes by creating a pilot program to empower states to use their own existing environmental laws and regulations instead of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), if substantially
The funding level needs to be greater than current spending, argues Rep. John Delaney (D-Md.) in a press release.
According to data from the Congressional Budget Office, a new six-year bill starting in 2016 would authorize $328 billion at baseline levels. To start making a dent in our infrastructure deficit, we should be investing ten to twenty percent more, meaning a six-year bill would cost between $360 billion and $400 billion.
Laing writes that "(t)he Department of Transportation has warned that it will have to begin cutting back on payments to states and local governments for infrastructure projects in November if Congress does not reach an agreement on a highway bill extension this month."
The Senate has already passed the six-year DRIVE Act, though it is funded for only three years.
Read the full story: House schedules highway bill markup
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
California plans to bury El Niño’s downpour
If the state plays its cards right, it may be able to store a billion acre-feet of El Niño’s water in aquifers.
Desperate measures: Advocates weigh draining Lake Powell to fill Colorado River
Draining the reservoir could reduce evaporation losses by a couple hundred thousand acre-feet.
Los Angeles just elected an urban planner as its mayor
Transportation analysts are optimistic that Raman will be more aggressive in addressing transit issues than Bass.
Mamdani’s pied-à-terre tax survives legal challenge
A panel of judges found that the plaintiffs failed to demonstrate injury as a result of New York City's implementation of the tax.
Eastern Nebraska is running out of electricity
Data centers and electrification are straining eastern Nebraska’s grid, throttling economic development.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
City of Rosemead
Rutgers University, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy
One Hundred Miles
University of Michigan School for Environment and Sustainability (SEAS)
Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY)
The Architects Foundation
City of Cambridge
Montrose County
The Pocatello Development Authority