Keep up with essential planning news and commentary, delivered to your inbox every Monday and Thursday.
Michigan House Road Funding Plan B Would Rob Peter to Pay Paul
Michigan legislators are getting desperate to find funding to address the state's "terrible roads" after voters rejected Proposition 1 by a 80 percent to 20 percent margin last month. We knew they were planning to resort to using so-called surplus general funds for roads, but the extent of diversion is truly surprising and upsetting to some public policy experts.
"The Michigan House approved a plan to shift hundreds of millions of dollars from the state's general fund and make other changes aimed at putting nearly $1.2 billion a year toward repairing the state's roads," writes Brian McGillivary of the Traverse City Eagle-Record. "Lawmakers also found $117 million through the elimination of the state Earned Income Tax Credit."
"The Michigan Earned Income Tax Credit lets working families who earn low wages or who have fallen on hard times keep more of what they earn to afford the basics," according to the Michigan League for Public Policy.
Eliminating the EITC to pay for roads amounts to robbing Peter to pay Paul. The $117 million saved by eliminating the credit is a drop in the bucket of a $1 billion plus transportation plan, but a huge amount to families who need the credit to make ends meet.
The plan would raise the diesel tax to 19 cents from 15 cents to match the gas tax and index both taxes to inflation. Registration fees would be raised by $30 on certain hybrid vehicles and by $100 on electric vehicles.
The largest amount of funds in the House road plan will come from the diversion of income tax funds according to the House fiscal agency memo [PDF]. Rather ironically, the plan also diverts tobacco settlement revenue so motorists can drive on better roads.
Doug Rothwell of Business Leaders for Michigan called for "a permanent, long-term solution to increase road repair funding without raiding the General Fund and hurting other critical priorities that are important to our economy," he told CBS. "The revenue should come from the users of our roads and bridges and be sufficient to ensure good quality road and bridge conditions."