Planetizen Newswire
Keep up with essential planning news and commentary, delivered to your inbox every Monday and Thursday.
A Silver Bullet for Climate Change?
Even as the world (unsuccessfully) tries to formulate a treaty to get nations to reduce their carbon emissions, researchers indicate it may be too late - the tipping point may have been reached. But what if CO2 could be extracted from the air?
Pipedream? Not if Carbon Engineering, a Canadian start-up company "formed in 2009 with $3.5 million from Bill Gates and others" has its way. A more immediate application of the technology, however, may lie "in developing a rational price for carbon emissions" according to Timothy A. Fox, head of energy and environment at the Institution of Mechanical Engineers in London.
Anne Eisenberg writes about the company and the technology - an application of the controversial process known as "carbon capture and storage" that may be essential to mitigate climate change, particuarly for the developing world that increasingly has turned to coal, the most carbon intensive fossil fuel, for power generation. According to World Resources Institute, "CCS is a critical option in the portfolio of solutions available to combat climate change, because it allows for significant reductions in CO2 emissions from fossil-based systems, enabling it to be used as a bridge to a clean and sustainable energy future."
"The carbon-capturing tools that Carbon Engineering and other companies are designing have made great strides in the last two years, said Fox.
"Yet the cost of capturing carbon dioxide directly from the air has yet to be demonstrated, said Alain Goeppert, a senior research scientist at the Loker Hydrocarbon Research Institute at the University of Southern California. Dr. Goepper recently reviewed the literature of air capture technology.
“There is a lot of speculation of how much it will actually cost,” he said, with estimates from $20 a ton to as much as $2,000. “We won’t know for sure until someone builds a pilot plant.” (An average passenger vehicle generates about five tons of carbon dioxide a year.)"
Even if the 'capture' part proves financially, feasible, there's still the 'storage' part. Eisenberg writes that an immediate, if somewhat ironic application would be for "enhanced oil recovery" whereby the CO2 is used to extract 'stranded oil resources'.
As for permanently burying (or sequestering) the extacted carbon dioxide, according to a recent U.S. Department of Energy report, there are "at least 2,400 billion metric tons of U.S. CO2 storage."
Full Story:
Published on Sunday, January 6, 2013 in
Topics
- Urban Planning Trends to Watch in 2020
- 'Guardian Cities' Calls it Quits
- Wetlands Bring New Life to the Salton Sea
- The Rent Gap Theory
- 'Missing Middle Housing Act' Would Allow More Housing Options in Nebraska Residential Areas
- The Best-Selling Master Planned Communities of 2019
- When Cities Are Designed for Driving, Car Bans Are Not the Solution
- The City as a Self-Organizing, Adaptive System – Part 2
- Opinion: No to the Oakland A's Stadium Project
- Metro L.A. Drafts Frequent Bus Service Plan
- Oregon Could Trim Opportunity Zones Tax Break
- 'A Strange, Second-Wave Gentrification' in San Francisco
- Positive Thinking for the Environment
- Restricting Floodplain Development in the Nation's Capital
- Report Explores Future of Seattle Interbay Armory Site
- Wyoming Legislation Would Add Tolls to Interstate 80
- Exploratory Scenario Planning, Explained
- Opportunity Zones Under Investigation by Treasury Inspector General
- Can Hydrogen Make a Comeback?
- S.F. Bay Area Driver Shortage, Canceled Trips and Routes
