A final vote of 69-30, with 19 Republicans joining their Democratic colleagues in the Senate, will send the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act to the House.
"The US Senate passed a historic, sweeping $1.2 trillion bipartisan package on Tuesday to shore up the nation’s crumbling infrastructure with funding for priorities like roads, bridges, rail, transit and the electric grid," report Ali Zaslav and Clare Foran.
The article also touts the bill as "a major achievement for both parties and President Joe Biden."
Here's how the article breaks down the $550 in new federal spending over five years included in the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act:
- $110 billion in roads, bridges, and major projects
- $66 billion in passenger and freight rail
- $65 billion to rebuild the electric grid
- $39 billion to modernize and expand transit systems
- $7.5 billion to build a national network of charging infrastructure for electric vehicles
- $55 billion for water infrastructure (including $15 billion for replacing lead pipes).
CNN's tally leaves more than $200 million of the total off the itemized list, however, and the actual sum of the investments in this bill have been something of a shell game for month now (it's a $1.2 trillion bill with $550 million in new spending, for example—the remaining total goes to current federal authorizations for public works, including highway spending). In the planning realm, pundits and advocates have disputed the extent of the bill's investments in the systems contributing to climate change for months now. Sam Mintz, transportation reporter for Politico took to Twitter to this morning to total the spending on highway programs at $303.5 billion, a 35 percent increase over current levels.
A separate article by Heather Long provides more detail and focus on the spending proposed by the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act.
Democratic officials—with at least some stake in the Biden administration's campaign pledge to "Build Back Better" by ending and reversing the well documented social and environmental consequences of the infrastructure and transportation status quo—have focused messaging on the smaller sums for ostensibly progressive causes, like the money for broadband, electric cars, and drinking water. Republicans are pointing to the money for bridges and roads and the permitting reforms included in the bill. The vote, and all of the statements, takes place just one day after the International Panel on Climate Change released a report offering proof of the "unequivocal" connections between human activities, like those enshrined by this bill, and quickly accelerating, catastrophic changes in the climate of the planet.
The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act will now head to the House of Representatives, which won't be able to take a vote until it returns from recess at the end of August. "Speaker Nancy Pelosi has indicated that the chamber won’t take up the bipartisan bill until Senate Democrats pass a separate and more expansive package without GOP votes under the budget reconciliation process, a stand that has been met with criticism from Republicans and pushback from some moderate Democrats," report Zaslav and Foran.
Additional reporting on the Senate's vote on the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act is available from NBC News and the Associated Press.
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
California plans to bury El Niño’s downpour
If the state plays its cards right, it may be able to store a billion acre-feet of El Niño’s water in aquifers.
Chicago breaks ground on $3 billion megadevelopment
The new neighborhood, titled Foundry Park, will one day host 3,700 residences.
California High-Speed Rail Authority CEO resigns after $600,000 scandal
Under Ian Choudri, the authority used taxpayer dollars to fund first class flights and trips to nightclubs.
Want to study the Missouri River? Soon, you may need unanimous approval from 10 states
Legislation would require 10 governors’ permission to study or build projects moving water outside the basin.
Desperate measures: Advocates weigh draining Lake Powell to fill Colorado River
Draining the reservoir could reduce evaporation losses by a couple hundred thousand acre-feet.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
City of Rosemead
Rutgers University, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy
One Hundred Miles
Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY)
The Architects Foundation
University of Cincinnati Online
City of Cambridge
Montrose County
The Pocatello Development Authority