Another State Rejects a 10-Cents per Gallon Gas Tax Hike

It was not your basic fuel tax hike. Utah voters were told that raising the tax would help education by redirecting revenue from the General Fund to schools that currently goes to transportation. Yet voters also passed decidedly liberal initiatives.

3 minute read

November 14, 2018, 12:00 PM PST

By Irvin Dawid


Oil and Gas Extraction

rungrote sommart / Shutterstock

As posted earlier, nearly 54 percent of Missouri voters rejected a 10-cents per gallon gas tax hike placed on the ballot by the legislature that would have funded roads and law enforcement. While Proposition D had its complications, the Utah measure likely proved even more troublesome for voters.

"Utah voters rejected a nonbinding opinion question that asked whether the Utah Legislature should to raise the gasoline tax by 10 cents a gallon to provide more funding for education and local roads on [Nov. 6]," reports Marjorie Cortez for Deseret News. Almost 66 percent of voters voted "No" to the advisory question that was placed on the ballot by the legislature.

Austin Cox, campaign manager for Question 1, said the ballot question was confusing for voters because it was nonbinding, that revenues would be shared with local roads, and historically, fuel tax has not funded education.

As posted in September, the Beehive State, like most states, places constitutional restrictions on the spending of gas tax revenue, generically referred to as transportation lockboxes. "In fact [pdf], Alaska is the only state to not have statutory or constitutional restrictions on transportation revenue diversion," according to the Eno Center for Transportation.

Had voters approved Question 1, the gas tax revenue would have gone to roads, but it "would offset general fund earmarks that, in past years, have gone to transportation projects and ostensibly make more General Fund revenue available for education," explains Cortez. The offsetting mechanism illustrates the extent to which state governments subsidize roads, i.e., proving that roads are not entirely funded by dedicated user fees but are dependent on general tax revenue.

Supporters...campaigned on the premise that the average driver would pay just $4 a month more in fuel tax, which would generate more than $100 million annually for public education, the equivalent of $150 per student. Higher education would receive $25 million annually while local road funding would increase $55 million per year.

Campaign finance and path to the ballot

Supporters, primarily Our Schools Now, the group backing the measure, raised almost $1.3 million. Opponents, including Americans for Prosperity – Utah, did not list any contributions.

Our Schools Now was going to place an initiative to hike income and sales taxes to fund education on the ballot, but they stuck a deal with the legislature which resulted in Question 1.

"This has been a very complicated message from Day 1. As soon as we made a compromise with the Legislature, we immediately saw support (for the former citizen's initiative Our Schools Now) decrease and we knew it was going to be a challenge," said Cox.

Voters approve progressive initiatives

When it came to other ballot measures, Utahans showed a surprisingly progressive orientation:

 Still, that's a far cry from rejecting a school fund measure, albeit one that hikes gas taxes, by almost 66 percent. Why the disconnect?

Related in media:

Related in Planetizen:

  • Missouri legislators approved a bill at the end of the legislative session to place a 10-cents per gallon gas tax increase on the ballot to fund road repair. It had the support of Gov. Mike Parson but was rejected by nearly 54 percent of voters.
  • Californians will determine whether to repeal recent fuel tax and user fee increases; Missourians to vote on a 10-cent gas tax hike over 4 years; Coloradans whether to hike the sales tax, and the most interesting measure will be decided in Utah.

Wednesday, November 7, 2018 in Deseret News

Young Professional

I love the variety of courses, many practical, and all richly illustrated. They have inspired many ideas that I've applied in practice, and in my own teaching. Mary G., Urban and Environmental Planner

I love the variety of courses, many practical, and all richly illustrated. They have inspired many ideas that I've applied in practice, and in my own teaching.

Mary G., Urban and Environmental Planner

Get top-rated, practical training for planners

"Planetizen federal action tracker" logo superimposed over black and white image of US Capitol dome.

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker

A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

22 minutes ago - Zachary Whalen

Overlapping highways

The state-sanctioned urbicide of Austin

People don’t kill cities. Freeways do.

September 8, 2026 - Benjamin Schneider

The Hoover Dam blocking the Colorado River. The river's water level is noticeably low. The cliffs surrounding the blue water are brown and jagged.

US to reduce Colorado River water deliveries to Mexico

A new Colorado Treaty amendment reduces Mexico’s Colorado River water allocation by 250,000 acre feet.

September 11, 2026 - The Arizona Republic

NYC Mayor Zohran Mandami speaks behind a blue podium.

Mamdani overhauls NYC's Vision Zero plan with 100 new policy goals

The overhaul aims to reduce traffic deaths and make streets safer for pedestrians, cyclists and drivers through lower speed limits, new safety infrastructure and more.

15 minutes ago - ABC 7 Eyewitness News

A New Jersey train approaches people waiting at the station.

Amtrak not solely to blame for New Jersey commuter rail's unreliability, report finds

A new study from the Garden State Initiative found that NJ Transit’s budget grew 20% across a 4 year period, but reliability declined significantly over the same period.

September 15 - Mass Transit

A tall, gray power plant billows smoke into a blue sky.

EPA erases limits on planet-warming pollution from power plants

Under Monday’s plan, power plants would still have some limits on how much mercury, arsenic and other contaminants they can emit.

September 15 - New York Times

FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?

After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.

Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold

The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.