This Union of Concerned Scientists study examines why and how to improve resource-efficient travel options to achieve diverse goals. It estimates that more efficient transport could save up to $201 billion in energy and $128 billion in health costs.
The new Union of Concerned Scientists study, Freedom to Move: Investing in Transportation Choices for a Clean, Prosperous, and Just Future, shows that a transportation system that gives everyone more transportation choices will be more equitable, save trillions of dollars, and fight climate change. More transportation options such as transit, walking and biking are good for the environment, economy, and social equity.
It finds that:
-
A system with improved transportation options and reduced driving could save up to $201 billion in energy infrastructure and $128 billion in public health costs through 2050, presenting a more effective climate solution than the current car-dependent model.
-
The auto and oil industries have a vested interest in car dependence, currently receiving more than 75 percent of public and private transportation spending and have lobbied for decades to prioritize cars over a more complete and affordable set of transportation options.
-
Science-based policies that prioritize more transportation choices align with community-based solutions where local advocates have long fought for a transportation system that prioritizes people over industry interests.
Recommendations
-
Invest in a complete set of transportation options for a system that offers abundant access to everywhere we need to go and promotes economically thriving communities in both urban and rural areas. This means investing in networks of safe sidewalks for pedestrians, paths for biking and micromobility, and frequent, wide-ranging, affordable, and clean public transportation. These efforts depend on promoting land use changes that allow people to live near high-quality transit without displacement, dismantling structural racism in community safety, and ensuring good jobs with high labor standards.
-
Prioritize transportation projects in rational ways, including the extent to which they help achieve climate goals, reduce harm to communities experiencing the greatest impacts, and improve access for those who need it the most. This will necessarily mean meeting more rigorous standards for expensive, high-polluting highway expansion projects that commit us to high maintenance costs. Instead, we must first address the backlog of existing infrastructure maintenance. Also, state departments of transportation and metropolitan planning organizations must be accountable and transparent in their decisionmaking on what gets built.
-
Make transportation decision-making processes representative, and meaningfully engage the people and communities most affected by proposed projects. For decades, the auto, fossil fuel, and road-building industries have profited from excessive highway expansion and denied us choice in transportation. All of us, whether Black, brown, or White, whether US-born or immigrant, deserve to have a seat at the table to ensure transportation projects truly benefit our communities.
Read the full story: Freedom to Move
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
California plans to bury El Niño’s downpour
If the state plays its cards right, it may be able to store a billion acre-feet of El Niño’s water in aquifers.
Chicago breaks ground on $3 billion megadevelopment
The new neighborhood, titled Foundry Park, will one day host 3,700 residences.
California High-Speed Rail Authority CEO resigns after $600,000 scandal
Under Ian Choudri, the authority used taxpayer dollars to fund first class flights and trips to nightclubs.
Want to study the Missouri River? Soon, you may need unanimous approval from 10 states
Legislation would require 10 governors’ permission to study or build projects moving water outside the basin.
Desperate measures: Advocates weigh draining Lake Powell to fill Colorado River
Draining the reservoir could reduce evaporation losses by a couple hundred thousand acre-feet.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
City of Rosemead
Rutgers University, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy
One Hundred Miles
Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY)
The Architects Foundation
University of Cincinnati Online
City of Cambridge
Montrose County
The Pocatello Development Authority