TxDOT has filed “takings lawsuits” against holdout property owners along the eight-mile stretch of I-35 slated for widening in Austin, but property owners say the agency isn't offering just compensation.

The I-35 expansion in Austin has drawn loud and extensive opposition from locals, including multiple lawsuits against the Texas Department of Transportation aimed at stopping the project. But TxDOT is in the early stages of waging a legal battle of its own, according to an article in local news outlet KXAN. Kelsey Thompson reports that an Austin-based attorney representing more than a dozen property owners has confirmed TxDOT is suing several of his clients over property acquisitions.
“More than 100 residences and businesses along the eight-mile project corridor — running along I-35 from U.S. Highway 290 East to State Highway 71 and Ben White Boulevard — were marked for displacement due to the planned expansions,” Thompson writes. Property owners began receiving initial offers from TxDOT last year as part of the eminent domain process (when the government exercises its constitutional right to take private property for public use, with just compensation). That catch, according to property owners? The properties are worth more than TxDOT is offering, which violates their Fifth Amendment rights and constitute an illegal taking.
“TxDOT has previously told KXAN it works with an independent appraiser to assess the market value of properties it’s looking to buy as part of a planned project,” Thompson writes. But property owners' attorney says those assessments don’t include dramatic increases in Austin property values in recent years, including changes to Austin’s development code like removal of minimum parking requirements, new zoning overlays, and opportunity for denser development. Property owners also contend that they can’t find comparable areas or properties to relocate with the amount of money TxDOT is offering. Their attorney told KXAN he "expects many of the jury trials related to the I-35 Capital Express Central project will come sometime in 2025 or later on."
FULL STORY: TxDOT sues several displaced properties amid planned I-35 expansion

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

Congressman Proposes Bill to Rename DC Metro “Trump Train”
The Make Autorail Great Again Act would withhold federal funding to the system until the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA), rebrands as the Washington Metropolitan Authority for Greater Access (WMAGA).

The Simple Legislative Tool Transforming Vacant Downtowns
In California, Michigan and Georgia, an easy win is bringing dollars — and delight — back to city centers.

Albuquerque’s Microtransit: A Planner’s Answer to Food Access Gaps
New microtransit vans in Albuquerque aim to close food access gaps by linking low-income areas to grocery stores, cutting travel times by 30 percent and offering planners a scalable model for equity-focused transit.

This City Will Pay You to Meet Your Neighbors
A North Kansas City grant program offers up to $400 for residents to throw neighborhood block parties.

Commentary: Our Silence Will Not Protect Us
Keeping our heads down and our language inoffensive is not the right response to the times we’re in. Solidarity and courage is.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Smith Gee Studio
City of Charlotte
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
City of Astoria
Transportation Research & Education Center (TREC) at Portland State University
US High Speed Rail Association
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
Municipality of Princeton (NJ)