Supreme Court: OSHA Exceeded its Public Health Authority

The Supreme Court ruled that the Occupational Safety and Health Administration had overreached its authority to protect the health of workers in large private companies. In a separate decision, it upheld a vaccine mandate for most healthcare workers.

5 minute read

January 18, 2022, 12:00 PM PST

By Irvin Dawid

The exterior of the U.S. Supreme Court, with an American flag flying above its large columns and white marble exterior.

Kostiantyn1302 / Shutterstock

In a major blow to the Biden administration's Path Out of the Pandemic plan, the main element being to "vaccinate the unvaccinated," the U.S. Supreme Court on January 13 blocked an emergency temporary standard written by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) that required most workers in large companies (100+ employees) to be vaccinated against COVID-19 or undergo weekly coronavirus testing and wear masks to prevent viral spread.

"The whether the [Occupational Safety and Health] Act plainly authorizes the Secretary [of Labor]’s mandate," referring to the large employer mandate, wrote the majority of justices in the first 10 pages of the 30-page, unsigned opinion in the case, "National Federation of Independent Business v. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration."

"The Act empowers the Secretary to set workplace safety standards, not broad public health measures."

"The vote... was 6 to 3, with the liberal justices in dissent," writes Adam Liptak, who covers the United States Supreme Court for The New York Times. "The ruling means that companies across the country must now decide between protecting employees, potentially losing staff members resistant to complying and running afoul of patchwork regulations."

Complicated but quick path to the Supreme Court

The final decision was noted on page 9 of the 30-page ruling [pdf]:

The applications for stays presented to JUSTICE KAVANAUGH and by him referred to the Court are granted.

The stays refer to the most recent federal appeals court ruling (Sixth Circuit in Cincinnati) that reinstated the OSHA rule on December 17. In November, at least 34 lawsuits against the OSHA rule had been consolidated and sent to the Sixth Circuit in Cincinnati after the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans had stayed the rule twice.

OSHA had introduced the rule, technically referred to as an emergency temporary standard, on Nov. 4 after President Biden addressed the nation on Sept. 4 to announce his plan to combat the Delta surge. The large employer mandate was but one of four vaccination measures aimed at vaccinating two-thirds of the American workforce. The other three:

  • Health care worker mandate, which the justices also decided on Jan. 13 (see below)
  • Federal worker vaccine mandate
  • Federal contractor and subcontractor vaccine mandate

Healthcare workers mandate

"The vote in the health care case was 5 to 4, with Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. and Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh joining the liberal justices to form a majority," adds Liptak. "That second mandate applies to workers at hospitals and other health care facilities that participate in the Medicare and Medicaid programs."

In both the employer and health worker cases, the justices explored whether Congress had authorized the executive branch to take sweeping actions to address the health care crisis.

In the unsigned majority opinion that occupies the first ten pages of the 23-page ruling of "Biden v. Missouri" [pdf], the five justices write, in sharp contrast to their OSHA ruling:

First, we agree with the Government that the Secretary’s rule falls within the authorities that Congress has conferred upon him...

The Secretary of Health and Human Services determined that a COVID–19 vaccine mandate will substantially reduce the likelihood that healthcare workers will contract the virus and transmit it to their patients. He accordingly concluded that a vaccine mandate is “necessary to promote and protect patient health and safety” in the face of the ongoing pandemic. 

The rule thus fits neatly within the language of the statute. After all, ensuring that providers take steps to avoid transmitting a dangerous virus to their patients is consistent with the fundamental principle of the medical profession: first, do no harm.

The five justices: Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan, and the two aforementioned conservative justices, are referring to the governing statute under which the Medicare and Medicaid programs operate. Liptak acknowledged the minority viewpoint:

In dissent, Justice Clarence Thomas, joined by Justices Samuel A. Alito Jr., Neil M. Gorsuch and Amy Coney Barrett, wrote that “scattered provisions” in the statute did not justify the mandate.

Path to Supreme Court

The final decision is noted on the first page of Biden rv. Missouri [pdf]: "Two District Courts enjoined enforcement of the rule, and the Government now asks us to stay those injunctions. Agreeing that it is entitled to such relief, we grant the applications."

Unlike the employer mandate, the  Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) mandate never went to an appeals court. Two district courts, one in St. Louis, the other in the Western District of Louisiana, had issued preliminary injunctions on the mandate in November.

Remaining federal vaccine mandates

A three-judge panel of the Sixth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Cincinnati, the same court that ruled in favor of the large employer mandate on Dec. 17, "voted 2-1[pdf] to uphold a ruling by a federal judge in Kentucky which found the Biden administration overstepped its bounds," reported Jared Serbu for the Federal News Network on Jan. 6.

As for federal employees, including those serving in the military forces, the vaccine mandate has so far withstood legal challenges.

Related in Planetizen: Biden administration vaccine mandates

Supreme Court rulings on other vaccine mandates

Vaccine mandates abroad

Thursday, January 13, 2022 in The New York Times

Large historic homes and white picket fences line a street.

The End of Single-Family Zoning in Arlington County, Virginia

Arlington County is the latest jurisdiction in the country to effectively end single-family zoning.

March 23, 2023 - The Washington Post

Amtrak Acela Express train passing through Harrison station in Newark, New Jersey

‘Train Daddy’ Andy Byford to Oversee Amtrak’s High-Speed Rail Efforts

Byford, who formerly ran NYC Transit and Transport for London, could bring renewed vigor to the agency’s plans to expand regional rail in the United States.

March 28, 2023 - StreetsBlog NYC

Buses in downtown Seattle on the dedicated 3rd Avenue bus lanes

Seattle Bus Lane Cameras Capture Over 100,000 Violations

An automated traffic enforcement pilot program caught drivers illegally using transit lanes more than 110,000 times in less than a year.

March 28, 2023 - Axios

View of Statue of Liberty with New York City skyline in background

Immigration Grows, Population Drops in Many U.S. Counties

International immigration to the country’s most populous areas tripled even as major metropolitan areas continued to lose population.

March 31 - The New York Times

Detroit Sports Arena

$616 Million in Development Incentives Approved for District Detroit

The “Transformational Brownfield” incentives approved by the Detroit City Council for the $1.5 billion District Detroit still require approval by the state.

March 31 - Detroit Free Press

A red sign reads, “Welcome to New Canaan.”

Affordable Housing Development Rejected for Lack of Third Staircase in Connecticut

The New Canaan Planning Commission rejected a development proposal, including 31 below-market-rate apartments, for lack of a third staircase, among other reasons, at a time when advocates are pushing to relax two-staircase requirements.

March 31 - Stamford Advocate

New Updates on PD&R Edge

HUD's Office of Policy Development and Research

HUD’s 2023 Innovative Housing Showcase

HUD's Office of Policy Development and Research

Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools

This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.

Planning for Universal Design

Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.