Supreme Court Allows Indiana University's Vaccine Mandate to Remain in Place

The Supreme Court rejected a request brought by students to block Indiana University from requiring COVID-19 vaccinations. Students, faculty, and staff are required to be fully vaccinated by August 15.

August 16, 2021, 10:00 AM PDT

By Irvin Dawid


An image of the Sample Gates at the entrance of the college campus of Indiana University Bloomington, with a street and the city in the background.

EQRoy / Shutterstock

A lawsuit filed by eight college students against Indiana University in June came to an abrupt end on Thursday night (August 12) after Associate Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett denied their request for emergency relief from a ruling issued ten days earlier by U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeal.

"People who do not want to be vaccinated may go elsewhere," wrote Judge Frank Easterbrook in the Aug. 2 decision. "He added that the university would have trouble operating if students were afraid that those around them were spreading disease," reported Arika Herron for the Indianapolis Star (via USA TODAY).

And the disease is spreading.

Barrett's decision comes as COVID cases, hospitalizations and deaths increase in most of the U.S. in what some are calling the Delta wave, named for the variant first identified in India. The Hoosier State has seen the daily average of cases increase by 125% in the last two weeks, hospitalizations by 71% and deaths by 85%, according to The New York Times coronavirus tracker on Aug. 13.

With 45% of the state population fully vaccinated, it is more vulnerable to the virus than most of the country which averages 50%.

The appeals court cited "a 1905 Supreme Court precedent, Jacobson v. Massachusetts, "that allowed Massachusetts to impose a penalty on those who declined smallpox vaccinations," wrote Kristine Phillips and John Fritze for USA TODAY in the source article.

Barrett's call

"Barrett, an appointee of President Donald Trump, is the circuit justice for the 7th Circuit, which covers Indiana," wrote Maeve Sheehey for Politico. She gave no reason for denying the emergency application for writ of injunction filed by the students' attorney, James Bopp Jr., on Aug. 6, which claimed that the vaccination requirement violates the students' "constitutional right to bodily integrity under the 14th Amendment," noted Phillips and Fritze.

"With a third ruling, now from the nation’s highest court, affirming Indiana University’s COVID-19 vaccination plan, we look forward to beginning fall semester with our health and safety policies in place," Indiana University said in a statement included in the source article.

The first ruling was on July 19 in the U.S. District Court of Northern Indiana reported by The Washington Post.

"U.S. District Judge Damon R. Leichty sided with the university in declining to issue an injunction after hearing oral arguments on July 13," wrote Nick Anderson, education reporter for the Post.

“Recognizing the students’ significant liberty to refuse unwanted medical treatment, the Fourteenth Amendment permits Indiana University to pursue a reasonable and due process of vaccination in the legitimate interest of public health for its students, faculty, and staff,” Leichty wrote in an opinion dated Sunday. 

IU, with about 90,000 students on several campuses, is one of the most prominent public universities in a Republican-led state to adopt a vaccine mandate. Purdue University, also in Indiana, does not have a mandate.

As noted in Planetizen's first post on the litigation, Republican Attorney General Todd Rokita had expressed support for the students, citing state law.

Earlier vaccine mandate litigation

The students' appeal is the first case to come before the Supreme Court involving vaccine requirements. An earlier case brought by 117 health care workers at Houston Methodist Hospital was dismissed by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas on  June 17.

Both cases fall into a theme that Planetizen has tagged public health vs. individual rights or freedom. The former won in these two cases, but in the case that actually went to the Supreme Court last November (see below), the latter won.

Related in Planetizen:

Hat tip to KHN Morning Briefing.

Thursday, August 12, 2021 in USA Today

Soldier Field

Phase 1 Revealed for $20 Billion Chicago Megaproject

Plans for One Central, a proposed megadevelopment that would add 22.3 million square feet of buildings to the city of Chicago, are taking shape.

October 19, 2021 - Chicago Tribune

A screengrab of the Caharlotte Future virtual open house.

Top Websites for Urban Planning – 2021

Planetizen's annual list of the best of the urban planning Internet.

October 25, 2021 - James Brasuell

An aerial image of the neighborhood of Buckman in Portland, Oregon.

Homeowner Groups Find an Antidote to Zoning Reforms: National Register Historic Districts

Many neighborhoods are moving to create historic districts on the National Register of Historic Places in response to the growing number of states, cities, and neighborhoods loosening single-family residential zones.

October 22, 2021 - Sightline Institute

Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools

This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.

Hand Drawing Master Plans

This course aims to provide an introduction into Urban Design Sketching focused on how to hand draw master plans using a mix of colored markers.