Supreme Court Allows Indiana University's Vaccine Mandate to Remain in Place

The Supreme Court rejected a request brought by students to block Indiana University from requiring COVID-19 vaccinations. Students, faculty, and staff are required to be fully vaccinated by August 15.

3 minute read

August 16, 2021, 10:00 AM PDT

By Irvin Dawid


An image of the Sample Gates at the entrance of the college campus of Indiana University Bloomington, with a street and the city in the background.

EQRoy / Shutterstock

A lawsuit filed by eight college students against Indiana University in June came to an abrupt end on Thursday night (August 12) after Associate Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett denied their request for emergency relief from a ruling issued ten days earlier by U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeal.

"People who do not want to be vaccinated may go elsewhere," wrote Judge Frank Easterbrook in the Aug. 2 decision. "He added that the university would have trouble operating if students were afraid that those around them were spreading disease," reported Arika Herron for the Indianapolis Star (via USA TODAY).

And the disease is spreading.

Barrett's decision comes as COVID cases, hospitalizations and deaths increase in most of the U.S. in what some are calling the Delta wave, named for the variant first identified in India. The Hoosier State has seen the daily average of cases increase by 125% in the last two weeks, hospitalizations by 71% and deaths by 85%, according to The New York Times coronavirus tracker on Aug. 13.

With 45% of the state population fully vaccinated, it is more vulnerable to the virus than most of the country which averages 50%.

The appeals court cited "a 1905 Supreme Court precedent, Jacobson v. Massachusetts, "that allowed Massachusetts to impose a penalty on those who declined smallpox vaccinations," wrote Kristine Phillips and John Fritze for USA TODAY in the source article.

Barrett's call

"Barrett, an appointee of President Donald Trump, is the circuit justice for the 7th Circuit, which covers Indiana," wrote Maeve Sheehey for Politico. She gave no reason for denying the emergency application for writ of injunction filed by the students' attorney, James Bopp Jr., on Aug. 6, which claimed that the vaccination requirement violates the students' "constitutional right to bodily integrity under the 14th Amendment," noted Phillips and Fritze.

"With a third ruling, now from the nation’s highest court, affirming Indiana University’s COVID-19 vaccination plan, we look forward to beginning fall semester with our health and safety policies in place," Indiana University said in a statement included in the source article.

The first ruling was on July 19 in the U.S. District Court of Northern Indiana reported by The Washington Post.

"U.S. District Judge Damon R. Leichty sided with the university in declining to issue an injunction after hearing oral arguments on July 13," wrote Nick Anderson, education reporter for the Post.

“Recognizing the students’ significant liberty to refuse unwanted medical treatment, the Fourteenth Amendment permits Indiana University to pursue a reasonable and due process of vaccination in the legitimate interest of public health for its students, faculty, and staff,” Leichty wrote in an opinion dated Sunday. 

IU, with about 90,000 students on several campuses, is one of the most prominent public universities in a Republican-led state to adopt a vaccine mandate. Purdue University, also in Indiana, does not have a mandate.

As noted in Planetizen's first post on the litigation, Republican Attorney General Todd Rokita had expressed support for the students, citing state law.

Earlier vaccine mandate litigation

The students' appeal is the first case to come before the Supreme Court involving vaccine requirements. An earlier case brought by 117 health care workers at Houston Methodist Hospital was dismissed by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas on  June 17.

Both cases fall into a theme that Planetizen has tagged public health vs. individual rights or freedom. The former won in these two cases, but in the case that actually went to the Supreme Court last November (see below), the latter won.

Related in Planetizen:

Hat tip to KHN Morning Briefing.

Thursday, August 12, 2021 in USA Today

portrait of professional woman

I love the variety of courses, many practical, and all richly illustrated. They have inspired many ideas that I've applied in practice, and in my own teaching. Mary G., Urban Planner

I love the variety of courses, many practical, and all richly illustrated. They have inspired many ideas that I've applied in practice, and in my own teaching.

Mary G., Urban Planner

Cover CM Credits, Earn Certificates, Push Your Career Forward

Logo for Planetizen Federal Action Tracker with black and white image of U.S. Capitol with water ripple overlay.

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker

A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

June 11, 2025 - Diana Ionescu

Metrorail train pulling into newly opened subterranean station in Washington, D.C. with crowd on platform taking photos.

Congressman Proposes Bill to Rename DC Metro “Trump Train”

The Make Autorail Great Again Act would withhold federal funding to the system until the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA), rebrands as the Washington Metropolitan Authority for Greater Access (WMAGA).

June 2, 2025 - The Hill

Large crowd on street in San Francisco, California during Oktoberfest festival.

The Simple Legislative Tool Transforming Vacant Downtowns

In California, Michigan and Georgia, an easy win is bringing dollars — and delight — back to city centers.

June 2, 2025 - Robbie Silver

Bird's eye view of studio apartment design.

In These Cities, Most New Housing is Under 441 Square Feet

With loosened restrictions on “micro-housing,” tiny units now make up as much as 66% of newly constructed housing.

15 minutes ago - Smart Cities Dive

Man in teal shirt opening door to white microtransit shuttle with cactus graphics and making inviting gesture toward the camera.

Albuquerque’s Microtransit: A Planner’s Answer to Food Access Gaps

New microtransit vans in Albuquerque aim to close food access gaps by linking low-income areas to grocery stores, cutting travel times by 30 percent and offering planners a scalable model for equity-focused transit.

June 13 - U.S. Department Of Transportation

Group of people at table set ouf with picnic food on street during a neighborhood block party.

This City Will Pay You to Meet Your Neighbors

A North Kansas City grant program offers up to $400 for residents to throw neighborhood block parties.

June 13 - The Kansas City Star