While dozens of companies are following state-mandated regulations for autonomous vehicle testing, Tesla has managed to avoid the same rules. It's time for regulators to step in, according to the Los Angeles Times Editorial Board.
An editorial in the Los Angeles Times calls on state and federal authorities to step in to regulate Tesla's 'self-driving' vehicles, which have managed to evade DMV regulations during testing and deployment thanks to the company's claim that the "full self-driving mode" is "intended for use with a fully attentive driver who has their hands on the wheel." Meanwhile, Tesla's marketing and claims from its own CEO give consumers the impression that the cars can indeed drive themselves with little or no human intervention. To date, Teslas using the company's earlier Autopilot function have killed one person and injured 17 others.
While Tesla follows the Silicon Valley ethos of 'move fast and break things,' dozens of other companies experimenting with self-driving technology on California roads are following a reasonable set of rules. They must have a trained and certified test driver behind the wheel and send the DMV regular reports on crashes as well as incidents in which the human driver had to take over to avoid a crash.
According to a California DMV spokesperson, "Tesla informed the agency that 'Full Self-Driving' cars are in a different category, known as 'level 2,' that incorporates more common driver-assistance tools like automatic steering and cruise control but still require attention from a human driver."
The op-ed argues that the company can't have it both ways: Tesla's vehicles should be forced to follow the same rules as everyone else before more people are injured or killed.
Indiana Once Again Considering Ban on Dedicated Transit Lanes
The proposed legislation would impact the construction of planned IndyGo Blue Line, the third phase of the city’s bus rapid transit system.
4 Ways to Use AI in Urban Planning and City Design
With the ability to predict trends, engage citizens, enhance resource allocation, and guide decision-making, artificial intelligence has the potential to serve as planners’ very own multi-tool.
LA’s ‘Spongy’ Infrastructure Captured Almost 9 Billion Gallons of Water
The city is turning away from stormwater management practices that shuttle water to the ocean, building infrastructure that collects and directs it underground instead.
The History of Racial Zoning and Housing Discrimination in the US
More than a century of discriminatory housing policy divided cities and contributed to the racial wealth gap and other social and economic inequities.
Opinion: Resort Towns Must Take Action to Keep Housing Affordable
The workers that keep many popular tourist destinations running find it more difficult to find affordable housing near their jobs as more remote workers move to scenic resort areas.
Commentary: San Antonio Needs ‘Thoughtful Reforms’ to Improve Affordability
The growing Texas city needs a new approach to meet its residents’ housing and mobility needs.
City of Grand Forks, North Dakota
HUD's Office of Policy Development and Research
Harvard GSD Executive Education
City of Laramie, Wyoming
Colorado Department of Local Affairs
Lassen County Planning and Building Services
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.