The Golden Gate Bridge District is looking at ways to improve safety on the bridge's narrow, windy bike and pedestrian paths.

According to data from the Marin County Bicycle Coalition and a Golden Gate Bridge District study, "a cyclist is five times more likely to crash traversing the Golden Gate Bridge as a motorist, and 21 times more likely to be injured." This indicates the need for improved bike and pedestrian infrastructure on the famous bridge, writes Roger Rudick.
The data shows that "there were 19 times as many solo bicycle collisions as there were bicycle-pedestrian collisions," partly due to newly installed fence slats that "amplify gusts, knocking cyclists over." The Coalition "is urging cyclists to participate in an outreach program, recently launched by the Bridge District, to get feedback and more information to figure out how to reduce crashes."
"[T]he District’s study, released last year, includes some specific improvements, such as: 'install additional high visibility wind warning signage along the west sidewalk to raise awareness' and 'implement a Standard Operating Procedure to shift bicycle traffic to the east sidewalk during hazardous wind conditions.'" The MCBC's assessment "also puts partial blame on Bridge District maintenance crews that use the path as a storage area," leaving less room for bicyclists to maneuver. "We are surprised to see that the study does not make any recommendations to increase clearances for two-way bike traffic going past construction material." Streetsblog comments that "crews would never regularly store materials in a motor-vehicle lane on the bridge, certainly not without significant traffic diversions and guidance. So why is a bike path seen as a suitable place to dump stuff?"
"MCBC is asking riders of the Golden Gate Bridge to check out all their recommendations, review the District’s study, participate in the outreach program, and take the Golden Gate Bridge District poll."
FULL STORY: New Push For a Safer Golden Gate Bridge

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

Congressman Proposes Bill to Rename DC Metro “Trump Train”
The Make Autorail Great Again Act would withhold federal funding to the system until the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA), rebrands as the Washington Metropolitan Authority for Greater Access (WMAGA).

The Simple Legislative Tool Transforming Vacant Downtowns
In California, Michigan and Georgia, an easy win is bringing dollars — and delight — back to city centers.

Albuquerque’s Microtransit: A Planner’s Answer to Food Access Gaps
New microtransit vans in Albuquerque aim to close food access gaps by linking low-income areas to grocery stores, cutting travel times by 30 percent and offering planners a scalable model for equity-focused transit.

This City Will Pay You to Meet Your Neighbors
A North Kansas City grant program offers up to $400 for residents to throw neighborhood block parties.

Commentary: Our Silence Will Not Protect Us
Keeping our heads down and our language inoffensive is not the right response to the times we’re in. Solidarity and courage is.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Smith Gee Studio
City of Charlotte
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
City of Astoria
Transportation Research & Education Center (TREC) at Portland State University
US High Speed Rail Association
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
Municipality of Princeton (NJ)