To some, the agreement promises too much funding for traditional infrastructure programs rather than 'adaptations and innovations.'

[Updated July 20, 2021.]
Strong Towns' Charles Marohn argues that the proposals of the Bipartisan Infrastructure Framework will "make our infrastructure crisis worse." According to Marohn, "[s]hoveling unprecedented levels of funding into current programs prior to any serious work on reform is a terrible idea, regardless of who proposes it."
Assessing the funding outlined in the bipartisan compromise, Marohn writes:
While $5 million for active transportation sounds nice, you’ll find $4.2 billion for trunk highways in the bill. If the $5 million for Safe Routes for School gets you excited, perhaps you won’t mind the $1.7 billion for county state aid highways. That $57.5 million in bus rapid transit seems really progressive until it is compared to the $430 million being spent on municipal state aid routes (a program to essentially turn local streets into highways). Nearly half a billion dollars is going to the Department of Public Safety, with $226 million of that just for patrolling highways. We’re going to spend more in two weeks on highway patrols than we will spend in two years in the active transportation account.
Marohn proposes that "[o]ur top-down infrastructure programs need to shift to support maintenance, not expansion, and make room for the bottom-up adaptations and innovations needed to drive gains in productivity." Moreover: "[w]e should not be cheering on a bi-partisan consensus based on some simulacrum of reform while an overwhelming amount of spending is going to programs that are making us weaker as a country, as cities, and as neighborhoods."
FULL STORY: A Preview of Bi-Partisan Compromise on Infrastructure (Sorry, It's Not Good)

The Unceremonious Death of a Freeway Expansion Project
The end of an Oregon freeway project didn't get much fanfare, but the victory is worth celebrating.

Converting Golf Courses to Housing Never as Easy as the Market Would Like
Thousands of golf courses have closed in recent years, but the obvious redevelopment opportunity represented by many defunct courses isn’t always easy to realize.

Sadik-Khan: NYC Congestion Pricing Program Potentially ‘Transformative’—If Done Right
The former transportation commissioner says the city must ensure the program isn’t “all stick and no carrot to succeed.

How College Campuses Fulfill an Urbanist Dream
Most college campuses in the United States are inherently walkable, mixing various uses with diverse housing options and transit networks.

Austin in Race Against Time to Secure Freeway Cap Funding
With a major freeway expansion project looming, the Texas capital is seeking federal funding to build several freeway ‘decks’ downtown.

Tracking the Rise of Biking in the U.S.
Since the Covid-19 pandemic began, most U.S. cities saw a sharp rise in the number of trips taken by bike, but a recent plateau indicates a need for better infrastructure to promote continued growth.
Caltrans
Caltrans
Knoxville-Knox County Planning
HUD's Office of Policy Development and Research
Washington University
Mpact: Mobility, Community, Possibility
Lassen County Planning and Building Services
City of San Carlos
National Capital Planning Commission
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.