Congressional Report on Transit Spending Stops Short of Accountability

Transit advocates were hoping the U.S. Government Accountability Office was finally going to expose the systematic failures of transit spending in the United States by comparing the practices of other countries.

3 minute read

July 23, 2019, 10:00 AM PDT

By James Brasuell @CasualBrasuell


New York MTA

Felix Lipov / Shutterstock

The U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) has released the long-promised report [pdf] on rail transit capital investment, stopping short of the scathing indictment of systematic failures by transit agencies some advocates were hoping for in the wake of a damning New York Times article, written by Brian Rosenthal in December 2017.

According to a GAO website, the report focused on four rail transit projects as case studies, interviewing the people involved from industry and government. As quoted directly from the report (page 4):

We selected two projects currently in operation—the Utah Transit Authority’s Mid-Jordan light rail project and the Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County’s Houston North Corridor light rail project; and two projects currently in construction—the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority’s Purple Line Extension - Section 1 heavy rail project, and the Maryland Transit Administration’s Purple Line light rail project.

Those case studies yielded to recommendations directed at the Federal Transit Authority (as quoted directly from page 38 of the report):

  • The FTA administrator should ensure that FTA’s cost estimating information for project sponsors is consistent with all 12 steps found in GAO’s Cost Estimating and Assessment Guide and needed for developing reliable cost estimates. [Recommendation 1]
  • The FTA Administrator should provide a central, easily accessible source with all of FTA’s cost estimating information to help project sponsors improve the reliability of their cost estimates. [Recommendation 2]

With respect to the first recommendation, the GAO's investigation found that FTA's cost estimating information substantially or fully met seven of the 12 cost estimating steps outlined in GAO's "Cost Estimating and Assessment Guide," but fell short of five of the steps in that guide. The report also found that "sponsors may have difficulty identifying critical cost estimating information because it is distributed across 14 different documents available to sponsors, 11 of which are intended for FTA's oversight contractors."

The report elicited an unenthusiastic response from observers. Brian Rosenthal, who wrote the big New York Times feature investigation that inspired the report, says the GAO fell short of doing what it promised: comparing the costs of subway construction in the United States to examples in other countries.

Alon Levy, whose writing in turn inspired the New York Times investigations, responded to the report with a blog post saying the report misses the mark. Here's Levy's summary of the report:

The GAO report is out now, and unfortunately it is a total miss, for essentially the same reason the RPA’s report was a miss: it did not go outside the American (and to some extent rest-of-Anglosphere) comfort zone. Its literature review is if anything weaker than the RPA’s. Its interviews with experts are telling: out of nine mentioned on PDF-p. 47, eight live in English-speaking countries. Even when more detailed information about non-English-speaking countries is readily available, even in English, the GAO report makes little use of it. It is a lazy study, and people who ideologically believe the American federal government does not work should feel confident citing this as an example.

Levy also includes a few strong words to indict the culture of accountability (or lack thereof) that allows spending on capital investment to spiral out of control, and independent evaluators like the GAO to fall short of their stated mission: "The process of learning is humbling, and some people prefer to remain proud and ignorant."

Monday, July 22, 2019 in Government Accountability Office

portrait of professional woman

I love the variety of courses, many practical, and all richly illustrated. They have inspired many ideas that I've applied in practice, and in my own teaching. Mary G., Urban Planner

I love the variety of courses, many practical, and all richly illustrated. They have inspired many ideas that I've applied in practice, and in my own teaching.

Mary G., Urban Planner

Get top-rated, practical training

Wastewater pouring out from a pipe.

Alabama: Trump Terminates Settlements for Black Communities Harmed By Raw Sewage

Trump deemed the landmark civil rights agreement “illegal DEI and environmental justice policy.”

April 13, 2025 - Inside Climate News

Logo for Planetizen Federal Action Tracker with black and white image of U.S. Capitol with water ripple overlay.

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker

A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

April 16, 2025 - Diana Ionescu

Blue and white Seattle Link light rail train exiting concrete Downtown Bellevue Tunnel in Bellevue, WA.

Why Should We Subsidize Public Transportation?

Many public transit agencies face financial stress due to rising costs, declining fare revenue, and declining subsidies. Transit advocates must provide a strong business case for increasing public transit funding.

April 7, 2025 - Todd Litman

Bright car headlights with glare at night.

Blinded by the Light: When Brighter Headlights Decrease Safety

Bright LED headlights can create glare and reduce visibility for other drivers and pedestrians.

15 minutes ago - Vox

Coronavirus Driver

Study Links Covid and Poor Driving

The effects of the virus, including ‘brain fog,’ can make driving more difficult and dangerous.

1 hour ago - Streetsblog USA

Streetcar and bus stopped at station on Market Street in San Francisco with Ferry Building visible in background.

Waymo Gets Permission to Map SF’s Market Street

If allowed to operate on the traffic-restricted street, Waymo’s autonomous taxis would have a leg up over ride-hailing competitors — and counter the city’s efforts to grow bike and pedestrian on the thoroughfare.

April 16 - San Francisco Examiner