Nothing Conventional About It: BART Begins New Diesel Train Service

By building a diesel-powered train line for the 9.2-mile extension to Antioch in East Contra Costa County, BART saved almost $500 million and began service earlier than had it extended the existing line, though a transfer is required between trains.

3 minute read

May 26, 2018, 11:00 AM PDT

By Irvin Dawid


BART Station

The new Antioch BART Station, pictured in February 2018 before service launched on May 26, 2018. | Pi.1415926535 / Wikimedia Commons

Unlike traditional diesel-powered, locomotive-hauled commuter trains, the new Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) trains traveling to Antioch in East Contra Costa County from the Pittsburg/Bay Point station will be quiet, self-propelled diesel multiple unit (DMU) trains burning renewable diesel, a biofuel also powering some locomotives on Amtrak's Capitol Corridor line from San Jose to Sacramento, rather than fossil diesel fuel. Conventional BART trains are electric-powered using third rail propulsion.

Until May 26, when revenue service began to the extension's two new stations, Pittsburg Center and Antioch, the 55-mile BART line had been called Pittsburg/Bay Point–SFO/Millbrae. [Wikipedia hadn't changed the name as of May 25, though it describes the extension here.] The extension was referred to as "eBART" during the project phase, a name that may stick even after service begins.

BART System Map

Courtesy of BART

"The new eBART trains can fit 104 people sitting down and 96 standing and will be able to transport 2,400 people per hour from Antioch to the transfer platform at Pittsburg/Bay Point BART station in around 10 minutes," writes Aaron Davis, who reports on East Contra Costa County for the East Bay Times. "Trains coming from the Pittsburg Center station at Railroad Avenue will take three minutes to arrive at the transfer platform."

Not like the BART/Caltrain transfer at Millbrae station

At Millbrae, the southwest terminal station of the 65-mile Antioch line in San Mateo County, passengers can transfer between BART and Caltrain, a traditional diesel-powered commuter train. The transfer can be awkward and time-consuming as BART stations are enclosed by barriers like traditional heavy rail systems. While the fare media is identical for customers using Clipper Cards, one must still "tag-off" one train system and "tag-on" to board the other. Worse yet, transfers aren't timed and can involve two escalator/elevator/stair climbs and require running through a concourse to get to the appropriate platform.

At the Pittsburg/Bay Point transfer station, the cross-platform transfer requires a mere 10 steps with no fare changes, i.e., it's the same as transferring between BART lines at other stations. Unlike Millbrae, transfers will be timed, with 0-2 minute waits in the peak direction, and 8-minutes for reverse commuters (see FAQ).

Michael Cabanatuan, a transportation reporter for the San Francisco Chronicle, writes, "The extension cost $525 million, compared with an estimated $1 billion it would have cost to build a conventional BART line 10 miles from Pittsburg to Antioch."

It might be better than no line at all, but there’s still grumbling in eastern Contra Costa about having to transfer from one train to another rather than being able to ride station to station on standard BART trains.

Transit-oriented development?

The extension appears to be designed for auto-commuters, running at 75 miles-per-hour in the median of a freeway, State Route 4. The terminal station, Antioch, boasts over 1000 parking stalls, with over a third "shaded by solar panels." Pittsburg Central has 240 stalls. The FAQ refers readers to Tri Delta Transit for more information.

Thursday, May 24, 2018 in East Bay Times

Sweeping view of Portland, Oregon with Mt. Hood in background against sunset sky.

Oregon Passes Exemption to Urban Growth Boundary

Cities have a one-time chance to acquire new land for development in a bid to increase housing supply and affordability.

March 12, 2024 - Housing Wire

Aerial view of green roofs with plants in Sydney, Australia.

Where Urban Design Is Headed in 2024

A forecast of likely trends in urban design and architecture.

March 10, 2024 - Daily Journal of Commerce

Cobblestone street with streetcar line, row of vintage streetlights on left, and colorful restaurant and shop awnings on right on River Street in Savannah, Georgia.

Savannah: A City of Planning Contrasts

From a human-scales, plaza-anchored grid to suburban sprawl, the oldest planned city in the United States has seen wildly different development patterns.

March 12, 2024 - Strong Towns

Aerial View of Chuckanut Drive and the Blanchard Bridge in the Skagit Valley.

Washington Tribes Receive Resilience Funding

The 28 grants support projects including relocation efforts as coastal communities face the growing impacts of climate change.

March 18 - The Seattle Times

Historic buildings in downtown Los Angeles with large "Pan American Lofts" sign on side of building.

Adaptive Reuse Bills Introduced in California Assembly

The legislation would expand eligibility for economic incentives and let cities loosen regulations to allow for more building conversions.

March 18 - Beverly Press

View from above of swan-shaped paddleboats with lights on around artesian fountain in Echo Park Lake with downtown Los Angeles skylien in background at twilight.

LA's Top Parks, Ranked

TimeOut just released its list of the top 26 parks in the L.A. area, which is home to some of the best green spaces around.

March 18 - TimeOut

News from HUD User

HUD's Office of Policy Development and Research

Call for Speakers

Mpact Transit + Community

New Updates on PD&R Edge

HUD's Office of Policy Development and Research

Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools

This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.

Planning for Universal Design

Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.