A Strong Voice of Support for Value Capture to Fund Subway Repair
As POLITICO New York reported March 21, Gov. Andrew Cuomo is drafting legislation that "would demarcate huge swaths of Manhattan and the Bronx as 'transportation improvement districts,' and allow the state-run Metropolitan Transportation Authority to take property tax revenue from those districts that it claims is generated by transit improvements as far as a mile away" for the purpose of rehabilitating the 665-mile subway system which has fallen into deep disrepair.
Planetizen noted much opposition to the proposal. Deputy Mayor Dean Fuleihan claimed it would wrest "billions" from New York City. The governor's proposal would "usurp the city’s control over its own tax dollars," opined Carol Kellermann, president of the Citizens Budget Commission, for City & State on March 21, as did a New York Post op-ed on March 18.
Kathryn S. Wylde, president and CEO of Partnership for New York City, offers a different perspective on March 22 for City & State.
The rivalry between New York City and state governments has confused the issue and made it seem to some as if this is a cynical money grab, rather than a praiseworthy entrepreneurial initiative by the MTA.
A failure to move this forward would put important projects like New York Penn Station redevelopment, the completion of the Second Avenue subway and new Metro-North stations in the Bronx in jeopardy, since the MTA does not currently have the money for them.
Wylde acknowledges the opposition but believes both sides can work together.
Value capture, as set forward in the executive budget, was interpreted by the city government, the Real Estate Board of New York and others as a money grab for tax revenues that rightfully belong to the city or an unfair supertax on real estate developers who are also contributing to area improvements.
That is easy to fix, and a process that ensures the city is at the table and able to negotiate mutually beneficial terms with the MTA is currently under discussion.
In the end, the case for repairing the subway should motivate city leaders and the Cuomo administration to reach an understanding to use value capture to fund essential public transit improvements, which is in everyone's best interests, she concludes.
Topics
- New York
- Infrastructure
- Transportation
- Urban Development
- Bronx
- Manhattan
- New York City
- City vs. State
- Cuomo Administration
- Opinion
- Penn Station
- Second Avenue Subway
- State Budgets
- Transit Funding
- Transportation Improvement Districts
- Value Capture
- Metro-North
- Metropolitan Transportation Authority
- New York State Budget
- New York State Legislature
- New York Subway
- Partnership for New York City
- Real Estate Board of New York
- Governor Andrew Cuomo
- Kathryn S. Wylde
- Infographic: Space Allocation by Population in 15 U.S. Cities
- A 20-Year To-Do List for Cities
- The Argument Against Home Ownership
- Does the Plan to Revitalize a D.C. Canal Too Much Resemble the High Line?
- Study: Not All Gentrification Effects Are Equal
- Research: Transit Times Determine Social Networks
- U.S. Economic Growth Shows Urban-Rural Divide
- Report Makes Business Case for Vancouver-to-Portland High Speed Rail
- The Great O'Hare Race (And its Discontents)
- Moving People Out of Flood Zones Is a Win-Win Strategy
- Another Berkeley 'First': Banning Natural Gas Lines in New Buildings
- An 'Urban Orchard' Next to the Los Angeles River
- Austin Mulling New Incentives for Transit Riders
- 'Urban Green Spaces': A Book for Planners and Laypeople
- The Myth of the 'Childless City'
- After a Bus Kills a Scooter Rider, Two Councilmembers Call for Complete Streets
- A Complete Streets Building Spree in Philadelphia
- Home Improvements Expected to Slow Substantially in the Upcoming Year
- As More 'Superstar' Cities Emerge, the Gap With Other Cities Grows
- Advocates Press for Harder Questions While Pittsburgh Experiments With Self-Driving Cars
