Under the new guidelines, developers will need to implement specific community engagement strategies, at times based on a neighborhood's demographics.
Seattle wants to make it easier for residents to learn about developers' plans in their area. "Often in the design process," Stephen Fesler writes, "developments move to local design review boards where the proposals are seen for the first time and are well set in their direction having had little or no community feedback."
A new set of guidelines, in effect starting this month, "requires applicants with projects participating in the design review process to develop early community engagement plans and then execute them in their local neighborhoods."
The plans "must include a mix of printed, digital, and in-person mediums to obtain community feedback." On top of that, developers who want to build in certain census tracts, dubbed "equity areas," will need to work with the Seattle Department of Neighborhoods (DON) to create custom engagement plans.
Fesler writes that "DON has tried to make the process for community engagement easy and cheap for applicants. A centralized, special website has been purpose built for the program, serving both community and applicants." Note that while developers must seek out community feedback, they aren't required to incorporate it into their intended designs prior to submitting for review.
See also: Seattle Planning Director Pursues Equity Amid a Pro-Growth Agenda
Read the full story: Seattle Hopes Early Community Engagement Will Help Shape Design
Changes in Store for Seattle's Design Review Program
Seattle's Design Review Program, in place since 1994, could see substantive changes in the near future.
New Community Engagement Practices for Seattle’s Comprehensive Plan Update
A major update of Seattle’s comprehensive plan is just getting under way, with new opportunities for local groups to get involved with outreach and engagement.
Study Casts Doubt on Streetcars' Ability to Spur Development
Examining Portland and Seattle's much-talked-about systems, the authors highlight the importance of treating streetcars as a viable transport option, rather than just a means to stimulate development.
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
California plans to bury El Niño’s downpour
If the state plays its cards right, it may be able to store a billion acre-feet of El Niño’s water in aquifers.
Desperate measures: Advocates weigh draining Lake Powell to fill Colorado River
Draining the reservoir could reduce evaporation losses by a couple hundred thousand acre-feet.
Los Angeles just elected an urban planner as its mayor
Transportation analysts are optimistic that Raman will be more aggressive in addressing transit issues than Bass.
Mamdani’s pied-à-terre tax survives legal challenge
A panel of judges found that the plaintiffs failed to demonstrate injury as a result of New York City's implementation of the tax.
Eastern Nebraska is running out of electricity
Data centers and electrification are straining eastern Nebraska’s grid, throttling economic development.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
City of Rosemead
Rutgers University, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy
One Hundred Miles
University of Michigan School for Environment and Sustainability (SEAS)
Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY)
The Architects Foundation
City of Cambridge
Montrose County
The Pocatello Development Authority