Like so many other transportation policies, congestion pricing risks being sold for the wrong reasons.

Charles Komanoff, founder-director of the Carbon Tax Center, writes for Streetsblog NYC on the hot-button of topic of congestion pricing, elucidating the effects of congestion pricing relative to carbon emissions, congestion, and quality of life.
Here's how Komanoff summarizes the effect a particularly ambitious congestion pricing scheme could have on New York's emissions:
The most sweeping congestion pricing plan proposed for New York City, Move NY, will cut tailpipe emissions of carbon dioxide, the main greenhouse gas, by an estimated 950,000 metric tons a year. A little over half of that reduction, 55 percent, results from fewer auto trips from the toll disincentive along with transit improvements funded by toll revenues. The remaining 45 percent comes from smoothed traffic flow, as the lessening in stop-and-go traffic translates into better fuel economy and, thus, lower per-mile emissions.
But, according to Komanoff, "Move NY will shave just 2 percent from the total and 6 percent from the transportation part — reductions somewhere between 'modest' and 'helpful,' and well short of game-changing."
This isn't an argument against congestion pricing—instead Komanoff's argument shifts the focus to the many substantial benefits of congestion pricing that won't necessarily be measured by reduced automobile trips. While it won't stop everyone from driving, congestion pricing will make it easier for everyone to get around, writes Komanoff in a rephrasing of the "moving people, not cars" formula (recently put to the test in Virginia, to headline-friendly effect).
The true climate pay-off, according to Komanoff, is in a city that functions better and "in the thousands of households, jobs, and activities that will locate or remain in the city, rather than fleeing our crushing gridlock and dysfunctional subways for the new exurban ring or the Sunbelt or even the inner suburbs, which aren’t 'inherently green' like NYC and have carbon footprints many times larger than New Yorkers."
FULL STORY: Congestion Pricing Will Help Stop Climate Change — But Differently Than You Think

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

Canada vs. Kamala: Whose Liberal Housing Platform Comes Out on Top?
As Canada votes for a new Prime Minister, what can America learn from the leading liberal candidate of its neighbor to the north?

The Five Most-Changed American Cities
A ranking of population change, home values, and jobs highlights the nation’s most dynamic and most stagnant regions.

San Diego Adopts First Mobility Master Plan
The plan provides a comprehensive framework for making San Diego’s transportation network more multimodal, accessible, and sustainable.

Housing, Supportive Service Providers Brace for Federal Cuts
Organizations that provide housing assistance are tightening their purse strings and making plans for maintaining operations if federal funding dries up.

Op-Ed: Why an Effective Passenger Rail Network Needs Government Involvement
An outdated rail network that privileges freight won’t be fixed by privatizing Amtrak.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Village of Glen Ellyn
Central Transportation Planning Staff/Boston Region MPO
Heyer Gruel & Associates PA
Institute for Housing and Urban Development Studies (IHS)
City of Grandview
Harvard GSD Executive Education
Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada
Toledo-Lucas County Plan Commissions