Charles Marohn responds to Noah Smith's article asking why American Infrastructure is so expensive and delivers a plan to attack the problem.

American infrastructure incentives are badly misaligned, according to an article by Noah Smith, published in May for Bloomberg.
Following up on that story for Strong Towns, Charles Marohn argues that until we fix the incentives for infrastructure, "throwing more money at this system is simply pouring good money after bad." Marohn starts with the example of a policy that provides federal funding based on lane miles of highways, and programs that pay for around 90 percent of new construction but only 50 percent of maintenance. Marohn reasons that these incentives don't push projects to be well-managed and cost-efficient, nor built with the goal to endure.
To fix these types of misalignments, Marohn outlines a plan in four parts. He argues that localities should be given tools and encouraged to raise their own funding for these projects, so that they will be incentivized not to impress federal services whose rules and mandates have to be made broad enough to serve the whole country but, instead, built to serve their own local needs.
To reward planning for the long-term, Marohn says, "[t]he only tool I would take off the table -- or at least constrain -- is debt. Cities should have the ability to take on cash flow take and make strategic investments with debt, but they should not be able to live beyond their means today -- intentionally or not -- at the expense of future generations." He goes on to suggest that funding should be tied to very specific initiatives, like a toll or sales tax to pay for specific maintenance. Lastly, he suggests tying the design, construction, and warranty for projects into a single contract so contractors are motivated to create lasting success instead of just passing the buck.
FULL STORY: THIS IS WHY INFRASTRUCTURE IS SO EXPENSIVE

Planetizen’s Top Planning Books of 2023
The world is changing, and planning with it.

Chicago Red Line Extension Could Transform the South Side
The city’s transit agency is undertaking its biggest expansion ever to finally bring rail to the South Side.

How ‘Daylighting’ Intersections Can Save Lives
Eliminating visual obstructions can make intersections safer for all users.

Green Spaces Benefit Neighborhoods—When Residents can Reach Them
A study comparing green space and walkability scores found that, without effective access to local parks, residents of greener neighborhoods don’t reap the health benefits.

Eugene Ends Parking Minimums
In a move that complies with a state law aimed at reducing transportation emissions, Eugene amended its parking rules to eliminate minimum requirements and set maximum parking lot sizes.

Chicago Announces ‘Better Streets for Buses’ Plan
The plan establishes a ‘toolkit’ of improvements to make the bus riding experience more reliable, comfortable, and accessible.
Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization
City of Morganton
San Joaquin County
HUD's Office of Policy Development and Research
HUD's Office of Policy Development and Research
Chaddick Institute at DePaul University
Park City Municipal Corporation
National Capital Planning Commission
City of Santa Fe, New Mexico
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.