President Trump is not the only one proposing a huge infrastructure plan—Senate Democrats have their own. The cost is the same, but financing is different. The Democrats' plan does just what Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell warned against.
Senate Democrats support the proposal by President Trump to invest $1 trillion in an infrastructure plan. It's how to pay for it where they differ.
"That is something that congressional Democrats have sought for years, but congressional Republicans have stymied us at every turn," Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) said at a press conference Tuesday, Jan. 24, reports Alexander Bolton for The Hill.
Schumer, however, is not interested in only cutting taxes to help private companies build toll roads. “We will not support tax credits for developers,” he declared.
“That’s not the American tradition; ask Dwight D. Eisenhower,” Schumer said of using tax incentives to promote the creation of toll roads, referring to the nation’s 34th president, who oversaw the creation of the American interstate system.
Of course, if President Eisenhower was alive, he would state that financing the nation's highway system in 1956 was a very contentious issue, although Schumer is correct in that tax incentives weren't used. Instead, after much debate, Congress settled on using gas taxes and user fees to finance the 48,000 mile, toll-free Interstate Highway System.
A one cent per gallon tax was approved, increasing the federal gas tax to three cents per gallon, plus "highway user tax revenue from excise taxes on gasoline, tire rubber, tube rubber, and the sales tax on new trucks, buses, and trailers would be credited to a new Highway Trust Fund and reserved for use on the Interstate System and other highway projects," according to The Rambler, the FHWA's highway history webpage on the federal gas tax.
Trump/Republican plan
Schumer wants the federal government to pay the tab, going against the direction of Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), who "told reporters last month the level of the national debt 'is dangerous and unacceptable' and pledged to oppose anything resembling the massive infrastructure spending bill President Barack Obama enacted in his first year in office," writes Bolton.
Trump’s campaign recommended “leverag[ing] new revenues” and forming public–private partnerships to incentivize the investments in transportation, clean water, a modern electrical grid and security infrastructure.
Republicans in Congress have embraced the idea of creating tax breaks to spur private infrastructure investment and have warned against any plan that would require massive allocations of federal dollars.
McConnell at [the Jan. 23] meeting at the White House reiterated his view that any package considered by Congress this year needs to be paid for and not add to the deficit.
Polling
A Reuters-Ipsos poll released Jan. 19 shows that Americans prefer a tolling approach to funding the infrastructure plan, with taxes coming in second. A debt-financed approach was least favored. However, when asked only if they would support using tax credits and tolls, and given no alternatives, two-thirds disapproved.
FULL STORY: Dems unveil infrastructure plan, reach out to Trump
Pelosi-Schumer-Trump Infrastructure Plan Already Meeting Resistance
Introduced on April 30, the $2 trillion conceptual plan is likely to be dismissed by Congressional Republicans wary of increasing taxes and adding to the deficit, according to an extensive article by The Hill published three days later.
Senate Democrats Consider $6 Trillion Infrastructure Package
In contrast to the $1.2 trillion Senate bipartisan infrastructure proposal, Senate Democrats are discussing a massive package that is more of a budget resolution than an infrastructure bill, designed to pass with 51 votes on reconciliation.
Democrats Make Peace With Trump for the Sake of a $2 Trillion Infrastructure Plan
Details about what the federal infrastructure plan would spend money, or where it would get the money to spend, have yet to be revealed.
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
Canada vs. Kamala: Whose Liberal Housing Platform Comes Out on Top?
As Canada votes for a new Prime Minister, what can America learn from the leading liberal candidate of its neighbor to the north?
The Five Most-Changed American Cities
A ranking of population change, home values, and jobs highlights the nation’s most dynamic and most stagnant regions.
Op-Ed: Why an Effective Passenger Rail Network Needs Government Involvement
An outdated rail network that privileges freight won’t be fixed by privatizing Amtrak.
‘Quality Work, Fast’: NC Gears up for Homebuilding After Helene, Trying to Avoid Past Pitfalls
The state will field bids to demolish, repair and rebuild homes in the mountains. After struggles in eastern NC, officials aim to chart a different course.
Washington State’s Parking Reform Law Could Unlock ‘Countless’ Acres for New Housing
A law that limits how much parking cities can require for residential amd commercial developments could lead to a construction boom.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Central Transportation Planning Staff/Boston Region MPO
Heyer Gruel & Associates PA
Institute for Housing and Urban Development Studies (IHS)
City of Grandview
Harvard GSD Executive Education
Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada
Toledo-Lucas County Plan Commissions