Another Study Shows That Narrow Is Safer Than Wide for Traffic Lanes
"Another study recently published supports 10-foot travel lanes over the 12-foot common practice on medium- and high-volume urban thoroughfares," writes Robert Steuteville, editor and executive director of Better Cities & Towns. "Planner and Walkable City author Jeff Speck wrote an article [posted here] last fall stating that state DOTs and county road commissions 'have blood on their hands' for building over-wide lanes in urban areas."
"The evidence cited by Speck on the safety hazards of wider lanes is powerful, though to date it remains pretty scarce," writes Eric Jaffe in CityLab. The evidence just got thicker thanks to Dewan Masud Karim, a senior transportation planner in Toronto and adjunct lecturer at Metro College of Technology, Toronto.
Karim looked at lanes in Toronto and Tokyo, specifically at crash data associated at randomly chosen intersections. He "found that collision rates escalate as lane widths exceed about 10.5 feet," wrote Planetizen blogger Todd Litman on the study in June, prior to its presentation to the Canadian Institute of Transportation Engineers' annual conference.
Side impact- and turn-related crash rates are lowest at intersections where average lane widths are between 10 and 10.5 feet...This challenges the long-held, but often disputed, assumption that wider lanes are safer.
According to a 2010 study published in the ITE Journal, six states require a minimum of 12-foot lanes and another 24 states require 11-foot lanes.
"The latest research clearly shows that 10-foot lanes are worth fighting for on major urban thoroughfares," concludes Steuteville.
Toronto has since embarked on a program to narrow lane widths, in part due to Speck's earlier work, notes Planetizen managing editor James Brasuell.
Hat tip: Len Conly, Sierra Club Green Transportation listserv.