Conservative Columnist Promotes $1 Gas Tax Alternative

Charles Krauthammer offers his own brand of gas tax hike that differs from others mentioned recently. One, it's much bigger. Two, revenues won't be used for transportation. It would be revenue neutral; all funds would be returned to taxpayers.

3 minute read

January 17, 2015, 7:00 AM PST

By Irvin Dawid


Truth #1: "The only time you can even think of proposing a gas tax increase is when oil prices are at rock bottom," opines Krauthammerand that's exactly what several state and a few federal legislators are doing. Of course, others would argue that in fact, there really is never a "Good Time to Increase the Federal Gas Tax."

Truth #2: Krauthammer has been arguing for gas tax increases for a long time, an incredible 32 years. His 2004 column is referenced in a 2008 post that is as relevant today as it was then, so he brings consistency, if not success, to his perspective. Most importantly, as an influential conservative columnist, he might be able to sway some on the political right who many see as the chief impediments to raising the 21-year-old federal gas tax.

In his latest piece, Krauthammer notes that some in Congress have proposed gas tax increases, e.g., the Corker-Murphy plan (12-cents), and Rep. Earl Blumenauer (D-Ore.) indicated on January 15 that he would reintroduce his 2013 UPDATE Act (15-cents), according to the Associated Press.

Krauthammer wants to increase the gas tax by $1. "And the proceeds should not be spent by, or even entrusted to, the government. They should be immediately and entirely returned to the consumer by means of a cut in the Social Security tax," he writes. For those not working, he'd rebate the the gas tax revenue to unemployment insurance or Social Security checks."

Of course, rebating the entire $1 per gallon to taxpayers would leave the Highway Trust Fund in the same predicament it is now, namely having insufficient revenue to match transportation spending—but that's not why Krauthammer wants a gas tax increase.

It's not only refreshing to read (again and again) Krauthammer advocate for what some economists and some environmentalists have long argued: "reduce the disincentive for work (the Social Security tax) and to increase the disincentive to consume gasoline."

Furthermore, it was nice to see his column emphasize not that we are the world's largest producer of crude oil, but that we are the largest consumer.

As for oil, we remain the world champion consumer. We burn more than 20 percent of global output, almost twice as much as the next nearest gas guzzler, China.

And it's always refreshing to see a conservative columnist speak to carbon emissions, and ways to reduce them.

And finally, lower consumption reduces pollution and greenhouse gases. And even for global warming skeptics, there’s no reason not to welcome a benign measure that induces prudential reductions in CO2 emissions.

Returning to world of political reality from the realm of possibility, the latest developments don't look good for a 10-cents gas tax increase, much less a buck. 

We noted here just over a week ago that Sen John Thune, the new chairman of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation "surprised the media when he announced on a Sunday morning talk show that a gas tax increase is possible." That didn't last long.

Joan Lowy of the Associated Press reports that the chairman has apparently had a change of heart.

"I can't see a scenario for some sort of user fee increase that you'd have to offset with tax relief in some other area," he told reporters. "Nobody is going to vote for a gas tax increase."

Thursday, January 8, 2015 in The Washington Post

Young Professional

I love the variety of courses, many practical, and all richly illustrated. They have inspired many ideas that I've applied in practice, and in my own teaching. Mary G., Urban and Environmental Planner

I love the variety of courses, many practical, and all richly illustrated. They have inspired many ideas that I've applied in practice, and in my own teaching.

Mary G., Urban and Environmental Planner

Get top-rated, practical training for planners

"Planetizen federal action tracker" logo superimposed over black and white image of US Capitol dome.

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker

A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

September 16, 2026 - Zachary Whalen

Passengers board an Amtrak train under a cloudy sky.

Amtrak, CN end decades-long dispute with eight-year agreement

The new operating agreement establishes an updated framework for the companies to work together, including processes to resolve disputes.

September 18, 2026 - Mass Transit

The Gross Reservoir, a large body of water surrounded by trees and mountains.

Judges permit Denver to divert 77,000 acre feet from the Colorado River for reservoir expansion

Overuse and climate change have caused the Colorado River’s water levels to plummet.

September 18, 2026 - Inside Climate News

A painted bus lane in NYC.

NYC DOT wants faster, more permanent street upgrades

The city is examining ways to build more concrete infrastructure without getting entangled in 'decades-long' projects.

September 21 - NYC Streetsblog

A woman looks at a utility bill.

'Something we’ve never seen before:' rising utility rates could strain city finances nationwide

Data centers, climate change and other factors have caused utility rates in the United States to increase by 38% since 2020.

September 21 - Smart Cities Dive

A person scuba diving in a coral reef off Guam.

Trump to overrule local leaders, lease millions of acres of America’s Pacific Island territories’ seafloors to mining companies

International law says that the Indigenous people of America’s territories have a right to prior and informed consent regarding projects that impact their countries.

September 21 - Grist