Known as the Lima Accord, after the capital of Peru where representatives from 200 nations met for two weeks, a deal was reached to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in preparation for talks to be held in Paris in December. But is it strong enough?
"(A)fter more than 36 straight hours of negotiations, top officials from nearly 200 nations agreed to the first deal committing every country in the world to reducing the fossil fuel emissions that cause global warming," writes Coral Davenport, climate and energy reporter for The New York Times, in an analysis of the accord reached under the UN Framework on Climate Change.
Unlike prior agreements, the accord reached at the culmination of the Lima Climate Change Conference on December 14 (which began December 1) "is the first time that all nations — rich and poor — have agreed to cut back on the burning of coal," writes Davenport. It "will form the basis of a sweeping new deal to be signed in Paris in 2015."
The strength of the accord — the fact that it includes pledges by every country to put forward a plan to reduce emissions at home — is also its greatest weakness. In order to get every country to agree to the deal...the Lima Accord does not include legally binding requirements that countries cut their emissions by any particular amount...
So, if not legally binding, where are the teeth? Jennifer Morgan, an expert on climate negotiations with the World Resources Institute, a research organization, explained that the accord "relies on a lot of peer pressure,” writes Davenport. Each country's plans "would be posted on a United Nations website and made available to the public." The premise is that rather than sanctions, the agreement will compel countries to act to avoid international condemnation.
The structure of the deal is what political scientists often call a “name-and-shame” plan.
Not all were happy with the agreement. Ben Jervey of Grist writes that the talks were "invigorated by the recent agreement between the United States and China" but ended with disappointment.
On early Sunday morning, delegates delivered a vague, four-page document that does little more than set the terms for what the parties will be battling over at the next big summit in Paris a year from now.
He is not alone. Geoffrey Lean, green columnist for The Telegraph, also refers to last month's U.S.-China agreement and feels let down by the Lima Accord. "The sclerotic UN climate negotiating system, which has now run for 22 years with little concrete result, rapidly reasserted itself.," he writes.
Note from New York Times: "A version of this article appears in print on December 15, 2014, on page A3 of the New York edition with the headline: A Climate Accord Based on Global Peer Pressure."
FULL STORY: A Climate Accord Based on Global Peer Pressure

Alabama: Trump Terminates Settlements for Black Communities Harmed By Raw Sewage
Trump deemed the landmark civil rights agreement “illegal DEI and environmental justice policy.”

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

The 120 Year Old Tiny Home Villages That Sheltered San Francisco’s Earthquake Refugees
More than a century ago, San Francisco mobilized to house thousands of residents displaced by the 1906 earthquake. Could their strategy offer a model for the present?

Ken Jennings Launches Transit Web Series
The Jeopardy champ wants you to ride public transit.

BLM To Rescind Public Lands Rule
The change will downgrade conservation, once again putting federal land at risk for mining and other extractive uses.

Indy Neighborhood Group Builds Temporary Multi-Use Path
Community members, aided in part by funding from the city, repurposed a vehicle lane to create a protected bike and pedestrian path for the summer season.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Clanton & Associates, Inc.
Jessamine County Fiscal Court
Institute for Housing and Urban Development Studies (IHS)
City of Grandview
Harvard GSD Executive Education
Toledo-Lucas County Plan Commissions
Salt Lake City
NYU Wagner Graduate School of Public Service