California High Speed Rail Project Threatened with Loss of Federal Funding

On Wednesday, backers of California's embattled $68 HSR project were grilled by the chairman of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines, and Hazardous Materials, Jeff Denham (R-Turlock), who wants to kill it.

2 minute read

January 17, 2014, 9:00 AM PST

By Irvin Dawid


FLV California train

California High Speed Rail Authority / Wikimedia Commons

At stake is not new federal funding for high speed rail, of which there is none listed in the omnibus bill unveiled Monday for California (nor for any other state for that matter), but existing funds promised to the California project.

"Six lawmakers from California testified before their own colleagues at the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee hearing, with Republicans -- led by Turlock's Jeff Denham -- opposing the project and Democrats including Fresno's Jim Costa generally supporting it," writes Curtis Tate of The Bee's Washington Bureau.

The Federal Railroad Administration has continued to make payments on its $3 billion commitment to the project. Denham questioned whether the Obama administration should continue to make those payments until the legal issues are resolved. He introduced legislation, H.R. 3893 [readers can vote and send email to Congress members via Popvox] to suspend the federal spending. 

Denham targeted FRA Deputy Administrator Karen Hedlund (see her testimony) as well as the California High Speed Rail Authority's chairman, Dan Richard. Both assured lawmakers "that there was no reason to stop federal payments to the project in spite of the setbacks."

However, "the state faces an April deadline to make a $180 million payment required to keep the federal money coming." That deadline explains what perhaps was mistermed here as a Hail Mary pass to keep the project alive by funding it with $250 million from the state's cap and trade fund [PDF] intended to reduce carbon emissions. However, that allocation must be approved by the legislature.

The hearing did bring out support for the project as well. Backers pointed to the fact that "criticism was less about substance and more about politics. Republicans widely oppose Obama's high-speed rail program, and the entire economic stimulus," writes Tate.

Unlike Republican governors in Florida, Wisconsin and Ohio who rejected federal stimulus funds for high speed rail, Calif. Gov. Jerry Brown remains a stalwart backer of the Los Angeles to San Francisco project despite recent setbacks.

Thursday, January 16, 2014 in The Fresno Bee

"Planetizen federal action tracker" logo superimposed over black and white image of US Capitol dome.

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker

A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

October 28, 2026 - Zachary Whalen

A car drives through a puddle, making a large splash. Rain pours down.

California plans to bury El Niño’s downpour

If the state plays its cards right, it may be able to store a billion acre-feet of El Niño’s water in aquifers.

October 28, 2026 - Grist

Lake Powell with much of the water evaporated.

Desperate measures: Advocates weigh draining Lake Powell to fill Colorado River

Draining the reservoir could reduce evaporation losses by a couple hundred thousand acre-feet.

October 30, 2026 - Yale Environment 360

People vote in Chicago behind blue privacy screens

Chicago voters approve permanent festival grounds, penalty for vacant property owners

Currently, major summer and fall festivals take over public parks for weeks at a time, drawing criticism from nearby residents

November 5 - Block Club Chicago

Mayor Zohran Mamdani speaks into a microphone. He wears a gray suit.

NYC votes to cut outdoor dining red tape, speed up permitting

New York City also voted to allow the Department of Transportation to begin work on urgent projects before notifying elected officials.

November 5 - The City Reporter

People in Los Angeles going to the polls, following a sign with an "I Voted" design

California appears to reject Prop. 45

The proposition would have expanded the projects that qualify for a streamlined environmental review, effectively paring down the California Environmental Quality Act.

November 5 - Cal Matters