In this Washington Post blog, Brad Plumer writes on a New American Foundation report on rising gas prices and their disproportionate impact on the poor and middle class. Public policies intended to reduce fuel consumption, however, benefit the rich.
A person of modest means is more likely to buy a used car than a new, fuel-efficient car, much less an even more costly new all electric vehicle, despite the $7,500 federal credit. In fact, when fuel prices rise, the used car market is flooded with cheap SUVs while compact cars are grow pricier and fewer. Yet subsidies and regulations predominantly aim to reduce fuel consumption from wealthier motorists, according to New American Foundation's newly released working paper, The Price-Induced Energy Trap (PDF).
The benefit of higher fuel prices in reducing fuel consumption
pales in comparison to the much larger expenditures in transportation resulting from the price increase notwithstanding some modal switch to transit, cycling, or commuting from home.
"In 2011, as gas prices have risen, Americans have cut back on fuel consumption by about 1.8 percent." However, "overall gas expenditures still rose 25 percent over the past year, or $102 billion. That essentially wiped out all of the benefits from President Obama's middle-class tax cut."
New American Foundation's Director of Energy Policy Initiative "Lisa Margonelli laid out the basic situation. Right now, the average family of four spends more on transportation than on health care and taxes combined."
From The Price-Induced Energy Trap: "Despite an anticipated 1.8 percent decline this year in gasoline consumption, for example, the overall expenditures for gasoline will increase 25 percent...Better understanding why very high gasoline prices do not lead to dramatic reductions in gasoline consumption could lead to policies that more quickly, and less painfully, reduce gasoline demand and consumer spending."
Thanks to John Hartz
Read the full story: How gas prices are killing the middle class
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
California plans to bury El Niño’s downpour
If the state plays its cards right, it may be able to store a billion acre-feet of El Niño’s water in aquifers.
Desperate measures: Advocates weigh draining Lake Powell to fill Colorado River
Draining the reservoir could reduce evaporation losses by a couple hundred thousand acre-feet.
Los Angeles just elected an urban planner as its mayor
Transportation analysts are optimistic that Raman will be more aggressive in addressing transit issues than Bass.
Mamdani’s pied-à-terre tax survives legal challenge
A panel of judges found that the plaintiffs failed to demonstrate injury as a result of New York City's implementation of the tax.
Eastern Nebraska is running out of electricity
Data centers and electrification are straining eastern Nebraska’s grid, throttling economic development.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
City of Rosemead
Rutgers University, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy
One Hundred Miles
University of Michigan School for Environment and Sustainability (SEAS)
Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY)
The Architects Foundation
City of Cambridge
Montrose County
The Pocatello Development Authority