Citing ‘absurd’ costs and community concerns, city supervisors are reevaluating a plan to build a ‘tiny home village’ for unhoused residents in the Mission District.
San Francisco’s Mission District may not get a proposed ‘tiny home’ village after all, reports Trisha Thadani for the San Francisco Chronicle. The proposal faces backlash from local residents and concerns that its costs, projected at $100,000 per unit, are out of line with similar projects, which reportedly cost as low as $10,000 per unit. While not a panacea for the housing crisis, tiny home villages are viewed as a cost-effective and fast way to build additional shelter and get people indoors and connected with services.
“The drama over the project provides a window into just how hard it is for the city to scale its housing and shelter system, even as a recent report from the Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing (HSH) estimated it would take more than 6,000 extra temporary and permanent beds to solve the crisis on the streets.”
The vacant city-owned lot where the community would be sited will be developed into affordable housing starting in 2025, Thadani points out. “Until then, officials hoped they could use the site to shelter those who are currently homeless in the Mission, which has struggled with a rise of people living in tents, drug use and illegal vending over the past few years.” The village would be the city's second such community. But local residents spoke out against the project, prompting county supervisors to put the plan on hold. The project was allocated $7 million, a price tag officials say could come down. Meanwhile, the difficulty of finding financially viable locations that won’t encounter neighborhood opposition makes the process of building affordable and supportive housing in San Francisco painfully slow.
Read the full story: Neighbors fight pricey S.F. plan to build tiny homes for the homeless
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
The state-sanctioned urbicide of Austin
People don’t kill cities. Freeways do.
Colorado’s Largest Data Center Could Rise Next to Homes — Without a Public Hearing
The proposed campus would consume 11 times the power of Denver International Airport; as it has across the country, opposition mounts.
Judges permit Denver to divert 77,000 acre feet from the Colorado River for reservoir expansion
Overuse and climate change have caused the Colorado River’s water levels to plummet.
Amtrak, CN end decades-long dispute with eight-year agreement
The new operating agreement establishes an updated framework for the companies to work together, including processes to resolve disputes.
Raised interest rates may kill financially vulnerable construction projects
The chief economist at ConstructConnect warns that if construction project owners are negatively impacted by the raised rates, it could result in delayed payments to contractors.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
Greater Baltimore Committee
Eagle County Government
Harvard University Graduate School of Design
The Architects Foundation
University of Cincinnati Online
The Pocatello Development Authority
The Urban Renewal Agency of the City of Pocatello
Journal of the American Planning Association