The Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors recently closed outdoor dining because of a sudden but rapid rise of coronavirus infections in the county.
After the L.A. County Department of Health's order to shut down outdoor on-site dining facilities, restaurant owners and other food service workers want to know why their service is under fire while retail and gyms are allowed to stay open at a reduced capacity.
What data did the county Board of Supervisors consult when making this decision? Farley Elliott says that Los Angeles County, despite having a "fairly robust" contract-tracing program, has gathered data that are far from exhaustive and clean. The County has faced great difficulty in tracking cases with "10 million inhabitants, 31,000 restaurants, few mechanisms currently in place to limit individual travel, and no mandate to collect customer data at restaurants or points of retail," writes Elliott.
According to county officials, it is estimated that up to 15% of COVID cases can be traced to "dining experience," Elliott reports. UCLA associate professor of community health sciences and epidemiology Shira Shafir indicates that according to the contact tracking data, outdoor dining could contribute to the spread of the virus. Officials point to risk in any activity that requires people to gather, and especially those that require the removal of face coverings.
Elliot says that the county Board of Supervisors' decision to close outdoor dining has nothing to do with the causal data connecting specific activities to the spread of the virus. "Simply put, county officials agreed to shut down outdoor dining because coronavirus cases and hospitalizations have been rising dramatically over several weeks, and reducing the number of places where people gather — especially unmasked — is one of the levers of power available to them," opines Elliot.
FULL STORY: Where Is the Data to Support Closing Outdoor Dining in LA? It’s Complicated
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
The state-sanctioned urbicide of Austin
People don’t kill cities. Freeways do.
US to reduce Colorado River water deliveries to Mexico
A new Colorado Treaty amendment reduces Mexico’s Colorado River water allocation by 250,000 acre feet.
Mamdani overhauls NYC's Vision Zero plan with 100 new policy goals
The overhaul aims to reduce traffic deaths and make streets safer for pedestrians, cyclists and drivers through lower speed limits, new safety infrastructure and more.
Amtrak not solely to blame for New Jersey commuter rail's unreliability, report finds
A new study from the Garden State Initiative found that NJ Transit’s budget grew 20% across a 4 year period, but reliability declined significantly over the same period.
EPA erases limits on planet-warming pollution from power plants
Under Monday’s plan, power plants would still have some limits on how much mercury, arsenic and other contaminants they can emit.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
Eagle County Government
Harvard University Graduate School of Design
Nashville Planning Department
The Architects Foundation
University of Cincinnati Online
The Pocatello Development Authority
The Urban Renewal Agency of the City of Pocatello
Journal of the American Planning Association