Brookings buils on the findings of recent research about jobs densification in cities around the country to make a larger point about the benefits of proximity in urban design, as compared to sprawl.
"New research from the Bass Center for Transformative Placemaking at Brookings confirms that when it comes to site selection, American businesses continue to value proximity."
Adie Tomer, Joseph W. Kane, and Lara Fishbane write to explain the findings of the research referenced above, tying transportation and land use planning to the discussion as the "ultimate enablers of proximity."
"The character of our urban form—including density, permitted use in buildings, and transportation designs—will either promote closer proximity or push economic activity further apart. And despite the best efforts of many business and civic leaders, the prevailing transportation model in the United States downplays distance and focuses too much on traffic," according to the article.
Earlier this month, Planetizen picked up the news of the research cited here, but the current article more explicitly ties the findings of the study to planning policies and more explicitly appeals for a shift toward less car-oriented sprawl.
"We propose a new model: prioritizing human-scale proximity and the shorter-distance travel it promotes," according to the article, before laying out a list of five benefits to more proximity and less sprawl, with more detail in the source article:
- Proximity promotes agglomeration, helping to grow industries and regional economies.
- Proximity requires less infrastructure per capita, reducing fiscal burdens on communities.
- Proximity offers more modal choice, making transportation more affordable and age-neutral.
- Proximity is essential to hitting carbon targets and developing more resilient places.
- Proximity incentivizes safer streets and supports a healthier population.
The article also includes one critical caveat: the proposal does not necessitate a Cobursian approach to urban development that would replicate skyscrapers all over urban areas. To get at the right mix of densities, the trio of writers suggests making better use of the new troves of transportation data available to planners.
Read the full story: Connecting people by proximity: A better way to plan metro areas
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
California plans to bury El Niño’s downpour
If the state plays its cards right, it may be able to store a billion acre-feet of El Niño’s water in aquifers.
Desperate measures: Advocates weigh draining Lake Powell to fill Colorado River
Draining the reservoir could reduce evaporation losses by a couple hundred thousand acre-feet.
Mamdani’s pied-à-terre tax survives legal challenge
A panel of judges found that the plaintiffs failed to demonstrate injury as a result of New York City's implementation of the tax.
Eastern Nebraska is running out of electricity
Data centers and electrification are straining eastern Nebraska’s grid, throttling economic development.
Seattle passes record-breaking transit services expansion
Proposition 1 will double the city’s transit tax to add 95,000 more bus trips and preserve 180,000 bus trips annually.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
City of Rosemead
Rutgers University, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy
One Hundred Miles
University of Michigan School for Environment and Sustainability (SEAS)
Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY)
The Architects Foundation
City of Cambridge
Montrose County
The Pocatello Development Authority