A new report details the trend of jobs densification in U.S. metropolitan areas between 2004 and 2015, finding a few large metropolitan areas leading an overall increase in jobs density. Still, many areas are seeing jobs disperse around the region.
Chad Shearer, Jennifer S. Vey, and Joanne Kim share their findings from a new report on the trends in jobs density in U.S. metropolitan areas.
This report aims to help leaders and local stakeholders understand how the changing demands for place are shifting the concentration and dispersal of economic activity within 94 large metropolitan areas from 2004 to 2015—a period of dramatic urban and economic change.
The findings suggest a need for local leaders to embrace policies and investment strategies that advance more concentrated growth patterns, while also supporting transformative placemaking solutions that help such dense places become vibrant communities where businesses and workers thrive.
The article that shares the report includes a series of interactive graphics to illustrate the findings of the report. The key findings: U.S. metropolitan areas are experiencing a higher-than-expected rate of densification of job growth. Densification favored already-dense counties inside these metropolitan areas, and densification for the country was driven by four areas: New York, Chicago, San Francisco, and Seattle. "In fact, these four metro areas accounted for about 90% of the increase in job density seen among all 94 large metro areas during this period," according to the graphic. "In contrast, overall job density in the other 90 large metro areas increased only 9%."
Other interactive graphics break down the trends by industry sector and specific metropolitan areas. Trends varied dramatically between specific metropolitan areas. "Out of the 94 large metro areas in our study, only 48 posted an increase in job density from 2004 to 2015," according to the infographic. Job density declined in 46 metropolitan areas, like Sacramento, California; Cape Coral, Florida; Scranton, Pennsylvania; Youngstown, Ohio-Pennsylvania; and New Haven, Connecticut.
Read the full story: Where jobs are concentrating and why it matters to cities and regions
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
California plans to bury El Niño’s downpour
If the state plays its cards right, it may be able to store a billion acre-feet of El Niño’s water in aquifers.
Chicago breaks ground on $3 billion megadevelopment
The new neighborhood, titled Foundry Park, will one day host 3,700 residences.
Satanic place names
From streams and lakes to valleys and canyons, I mapped more than 1,000 places named after the Devil.
California High-Speed Rail Authority CEO resigns after $600,000 scandal
Under Ian Choudri, the authority used taxpayer dollars to fund first class flights and trips to nightclubs.
Want to study the Missouri River? Soon, you may need unanimous approval from 10 states
Legislation would require 10 governors’ permission to study or build projects moving water outside the basin.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
City of Rosemead
Rutgers University, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy
One Hundred Miles
Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY)
The Architects Foundation
University of Cincinnati Online
City of Cambridge
Montrose County
The Pocatello Development Authority