The agency is losing almost half of the team that oversees autonomous vehicle safety, among dozens of other key personnel.

According to reporting by Ian Duncan in The Washington Post, recent firings at the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) include “an engineer who worked with crash test dummies, employees who work with states on safety grant funding, and a research psychologist focused on drunken driving and speeding.”
“In all, the agency, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, will lose between 70 and 80 people, split roughly evenly between firings of probationary employees and buyouts, according to three people, who like others spoke on the condition of anonymity to avoid retribution.” The NHTSA employs roughly 800 people and is crucial to road safety efforts.
The firings include three out of the seven people tasked with overseeing autonomous vehicle safety. Whether or not the cuts were targeted, one former worker said they will amount to “less scrutiny of robotic vehicles.” According to one fired engineer, “The amount of people in the federal government who are able to understand this adequately is very small. Now it’s almost nonexistent.”
The NHTSA has several open investigations into autonomous vehicle technology, including Tesla’s self-driving features, Ford’s driver assistance technology, and autonomous taxi services Waymo and Zoox.
FULL STORY: DOGE employee cuts fall heavily on agency that regulates Musk’s Tesla

Florida Considers Legalizing ADUs
Current state law allows — but doesn’t require — cities to permit accessory dwelling units in single-family residential neighborhoods.

HUD Announces Plan to Build Housing on Public Lands
The agency will identify federally owned parcels appropriate for housing development and streamline the regulatory process to lease or transfer land to housing authorities and nonprofit developers.

Conservatives’ Decongestion Pricing Flip-Flop
When it comes to solving traffic problems, the current federal administration is on track for failure, waste, and hypocrisy.

Research Shows More Roads = More Driving
A national study shows, once again, that increasing road supply induces additional vehicle travel, particularly over the long run.

Can Progressive Planners Appeal to Conservative Principles?
Trump’s approach to policies like NYC’s congestion pricing isn’t just irrational and wasteful — it defies the tenets of conservatism. But there are ways to reframe the issues.

Oak Park Plans Earth Month Events
Join Oak Park, Illinois, for a series of Earth Month events highlighting the importance of community engagement and education, integrating sustainability into local plans, and planning for the most vulnerable, such as birds, bees and butterflies.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Florida Atlantic University
City of Grandview
Harvard GSD Executive Education
UCLA Lewis Center for Regional Policy Studies
City of Piedmont, CA
NYU Wagner Graduate School of Public Service
City of Cambridge, Maryland