The Messy Politics of Saving Lives from Drug Overdoses

Philadelphia was on the verge of approving a key harm reduction strategy to prevent fatal drug overdoses until the city council all but banned supervised injection sites, overriding a mayoral veto. A New York Times report explores the controversy.

4 minute read

October 26, 2023, 7:00 AM PDT

By Irvin Dawid

Row of five white chairs set against a blue wall with a round white analog clock. Clinic waiting room.

concept w / Adobe Stock

“Nearly 110,000 people died last year of drug overdoses in the United States, according to preliminary federal data published on [May 17], a staggering figure that nonetheless represented a plateau after two years of sharp increases,” reported Noah Weiland for The New York Times on May 17.

The preliminary count of 109,680 overdose deaths was only slightly higher than the figure for 2021, when 109,179 people were estimated to have died, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Overdose deaths had climbed significantly that year and the prior year, increasing by roughly 17 percent in 2021 and 30 percent in 2020.

[Related: U.S. Life Expectancy Continues Downward Trend, December 1, 2018]

Weiland adds, “Many of the interventions that the Biden administration has called for in a bid to reduce overdose deaths are loosely organized in a strategy known as “harm reduction,” which encourages the use of tools that make drug consumption safer.” Perhaps the most controversial are “supervised drug consumption sites, in which people are allowed to take illicit drugs under professional supervision,” though the degree of support by the Biden administration appears uncertain.


The City of Brotherly Love disproportionately suffers from overdose deaths, having the nation's third highest per capita death rates among big cities in 2020, after Baltimore and Cleveland, according to data shown by Drexel University's Urban Health Collaborative.

Nearly six years ago, Planetizen posted that Philadelphia “Could Be the First U.S. City to Open a Sanctioned Safe Injection Site.” [Follow-up post on February 8, 2019: “Federal Government Intervenes to Halt Planned Supervised Injection Site in Philadelphia.”].

Last month

“Instead, it’s about to become the first major city to enact a near-total ban on such sites,” reported Nicole Leonard, a health and science correspondent for WHYY News, the city's NPR and PBS station, on September 14.

Philadelphia City Council passed legislation Thursday that will ban what are sometimes called overdose prevention centers in nearly all neighborhoods and city districts.

The proposed ban passed in a 13 to 1 vote, with Councilmember Kendra Brooks casting the single no vote. The legislation next goes to Mayor Jim Kenney for final approval.

Three days later, Leonard reported that “Philadelphia Mayor Jim Kenney called a plan to ban supervised injection sites across the city ‘troublingly anti-science and misleading.’”

Kenney announced [Sept. 17] he intends to veto legislation that would prohibit what are sometimes called overdose prevention sites, which allow people to bring and use illegal drugs under the supervision of professionals who can intervene and prevent fatal overdoses.

The following day the city council overrode the veto by the same 13-1 vote. It wasn't the first override of a mayoral veto by the council posted on Planetizen.


To make sense of the ultimate rejection of a proven risk reduction (or harm reduction) strategy that saves lives, Weiland, a New York Times health correspondent, reports from Philadelphia on October 20 on the opioid epidemic in general and supervised injections sites in particular in the source article.

Public health experts have long endorsed a controversial strategy to blunt the opioid epidemic that has been sweeping cities like Philadelphia: supervised drug consumption sites, in which people are allowed to take illicit drugs under professional supervision.

The sites employ medical and social workers who guard against overdoses by supplying oxygen and naloxone, the overdose-reversing drug, and by distributing clean needles and other resources to opioid users. New York City has two sites, the only ones operating openly in the nation.

But then there are the politics of placing these facilities in people's neighborhoods.

But critics argue that the sites encourage a culture of permissiveness around illegal drugs, formally sanctioning opioid use in neighborhoods already struggling with high overdose rates.

In fact, advocating for safe injection sites can have an unintended effect. The sponsor of the measure to ban the sites, first-term Philadelphia City Councilmember Quetcy M. Lozada, has suggest an alternative:

She supports involuntary roundups [pdf] of opioid users, using the courts to route them to treatment facilities, a strategy that some public health experts have said is punitive and unproductive.

[Note passage of SB 43 in California this year in related post: “Election 2024: California Voters to Decide on $6 Billion Homelessness Bond,” October 18, 2023.]

What follows is a deep dive nationwide into these safe drug consumption sites, e.g., Gov. Newsom vetoing legislation in August 2022 that would have allowed some California cities to open supervised drug-injection sites as part of a pilot program intended to reduce fatal overdoses.

While the politics is controversial, Weiland writes that research has shown that “[s]upervised consumption sites have not led to upticks in neighborhood crime or community drug use...[a]nd they can save lives.”

Additional reading in The Conversation: Philadelphia bans supervised injection sites – evidence suggests keeping drug users on the street could do more harm than good,” October 12, 2023.

Friday, October 20, 2023 in The New York Times

Rendering of electric scooters, electric cars, light rail train, and apartments in background.

Arizona’s ‘Car-Free’ Community Takes Shape

Culdesac Tempe has been welcoming residents since last year.

February 14, 2024 - The Cool Down

Aerial view of New York City architecture with augmented reality visualization, blue digital holograms over buildings and skyscrapers

4 Ways to Use AI in Urban Planning and City Design

With the ability to predict trends, engage citizens, enhance resource allocation, and guide decision-making, artificial intelligence has the potential to serve as planners’ very own multi-tool.

February 20, 2024 - ArchDaily

"It's The Climate" sign over street in Grants Pass, Oregon.

Oregon Town Seeks Funding for Ambitious Resilience Plan

Like other rural communities, Grants Pass is eager to access federal funding aimed at sustainability initiatives, but faces challenges when it comes to meeting grant requirements.

February 18, 2024 - The Daily Yonder

Close-up of bottom half of stroller being pushed onto sidewalk with no curb cut by person in jeans and brown shoes.

How Infrastructure Communicates Values

The presence and quality of sidewalks, curb cuts, and other basic elements of infrastructure can speak to much more than just economic decisions.

February 23 - Strong Towns

Greyhound and Amtrak buses at a temporary bus terminal in San Francisco, California.

Despite High Ridership, Intercity Bus Lines Are Eliminating Stations

Riders on the ‘forgotten stepchild’ of the U.S. transportation system find themselves waiting for buses curbside as Greyhound sells off its real estate in many U.S. cities.

February 23 - Governing

Buffalo, New York

Buffalo Residents Push Back on Proposed Cap Park

State and local officials say the $1 billion project will heal neighborhoods divided by the Kensington Expressway, but community members say the proposed plan will exacerbate already poor air quality in the area.

February 23 - Bloomberg CityLab

Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools

This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.

Planning for Universal Design

Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.