It's been more than a century since the Seattle City Council decided to remove farmstands to make space for cars at the Pike Place Market. Public and political opinion is starting to see that decision as a mistake that can be reversed.
The Seattle Times Editorial Board has picked a side in one of the most heated urbanism debates to emerge from Seattle's pandemic experience: whether to block cars from accessing the streets in front of the Pike Place Market.
"City and Pike Place Market officials should make a priority of getting cars off the three blocks of Pike Place fronting the market, and the block of Pike Street that connects the market to the city," according to the editorial board.
A news article by David Kroman for The Seattle Times, published earlier in December, documents the growing public and political support for the change after the pandemic created an opening for a conversation about an idea that had previously been considered a political third rail.
Now The Seattle Times editorial board is willing to say what only the most ardent multi-modal advocates have been saying for years: it's probably not a good idea to allow cars and people to mix in one of the most visited corners of the city.
"If it was ever a good idea to allow motorists to drive through the crowds jostling along the brick street to browse market wares or stage selfies, that day has long passed. It shouldn’t take a heroic civic effort to block traffic from a minuscule fraction of downtown streets to benefit pedestrians who flock to the market by the millions each year," according to the editorial.
Any potential car-free future for the market is still a long way off, however. So far city officials with the power to expedite the car-free changes are only promising meetings—which could take a long time in a city famous for the 'Seattle Process,' which the editorial describes as "endless conversations and stalled progress."
Read the full story: Let pedestrians enjoy Pike Place Market without cars
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
California plans to bury El Niño’s downpour
If the state plays its cards right, it may be able to store a billion acre-feet of El Niño’s water in aquifers.
Desperate measures: Advocates weigh draining Lake Powell to fill Colorado River
Draining the reservoir could reduce evaporation losses by a couple hundred thousand acre-feet.
California city breaks ground on transit connector
The project includes three mobility hubs and a pedestrian bridge.
After public outcry, Massachusetts city releases housing development tracker
Cambridge’s tracker currently shows 250 housing projects in various stages of development.
40 years after approval, Chicago breaks ground on new park
The park honors Jean Baptiste Point du Sable, the city’s first permanent non-native settler.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
City of Rosemead
Rutgers University, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy
One Hundred Miles
Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY)
The Architects Foundation
University of Cincinnati Online
City of Cambridge
Montrose County
The Pocatello Development Authority