The Texas Attorney General took a break from its crusade against unsubstantiated claims of voter fraud to weigh in on a controversial question of property rights.
Legal questions about the use of eminent domain for the Texas Central Railway high-speed rail system between Houston and Dallas are persisting nearly six months after the Texas Supreme Court refused to hear an appeal for a lawsuit filed by a Leon County landowner, James Miles, potentially affected by the route's construction.
Planetizen picked up news of the unanswered legal questions surrounding the use of eminent domain for the Texas Central Railway in 2014, 2016, and 2020. In 2021, the news seemed mostly positive for Texas Central after the private rail company signed construction contracts signed and bagged the aforementioned decision by the state's highest court.
According to an article by Alexa Ura for the Texas Tribune, however, the legal case against the company's use of eminent domain has a powerful new proponent, adding a new twist in the saga.
"The Texas attorney general’s office has put its weight behind a landowner’s case against the companies developing a controversial Dallas-Houston bullet train, arguing they can’t force people to sell parcels needed for the high-speed rail project," writes Ura.
"In a legal brief filed with the Texas Supreme Court on Friday, deputies for Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton argued the high court should reverse that appellate decision and rule in Miles’ favor because the companies fall short of the Texas Constitution’s definition of a rail company," explains Ura.
If Texas central clears these legal hurdles and acquires the necessary funding (promised to be sourced from private sources), the system would accommodate trains traveling up to 205 mph and making the trip between Dallas and Houston—which takes four hours by car—in 90 minutes.
Read the full story: In Texas Supreme Court case, state argues that Dallas-Houston bullet train developer can’t use eminent domain
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
California plans to bury El Niño’s downpour
If the state plays its cards right, it may be able to store a billion acre-feet of El Niño’s water in aquifers.
Chicago breaks ground on $3 billion megadevelopment
The new neighborhood, titled Foundry Park, will one day host 3,700 residences.
Satanic place names
From streams and lakes to valleys and canyons, I mapped more than 1,000 places named after the Devil.
California High-Speed Rail Authority CEO resigns after $600,000 scandal
Under Ian Choudri, the authority used taxpayer dollars to fund first class flights and trips to nightclubs.
Want to study the Missouri River? Soon, you may need unanimous approval from 10 states
Legislation would require 10 governors’ permission to study or build projects moving water outside the basin.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
City of Rosemead
Rutgers University, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy
One Hundred Miles
Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY)
The Architects Foundation
University of Cincinnati Online
City of Cambridge
Montrose County
The Pocatello Development Authority