The cost increases and delays on the Central Valley project have some state lawmakers wondering whether funds should go toward local transit systems instead.
"Thirteen years since California voters approved $10 billion to build a bullet train," writes Marissa Garcia, "Democrats who run the state government are divided over spending the money to finish building the first section of track — a 119-mile stretch in the Central Valley."
Some wonder whether the funds would be better spent expanding urban transit in more heavily populated regions. Ethan Elkind, director of the climate program at the UC Berkeley School of Law, says starting the project in the Central Valley was unusual. "Typically what you’d see with projects like this is they’d start where the people are at and then radiate outwards. So, we would have started building high-speed rail in the San Francisco Bay Area, down in LA, and then eventually connect it," Elkind told CalMatters.
"The Newsom administration, however, praises high-speed rail as a job creator in the economically-struggling Central Valley." But "[k]ey lawmakers, especially in the Assembly, say they don’t see the benefit for their Southern California constituents. And even if the bullet train eventually reaches Los Angeles and San Francisco, some legislators are skeptical that car-centric Californians will become train riders without more exposure to public transit in their daily lives."
Assembly Transportation Committee chairperson Laura Friedman questioned the value of spending additional billions on the Central Valley train. "With a quarter of California’s population living in Los Angeles County, Friedman would like to see money spent on improving Union Station in Los Angeles, the Metrolink commuter rail and transit between the San Fernando Valley and LA’s Westside." She argues that "better local service will boost support for trains, eventually restoring voters’ favor for high-speed rail."
"A poll funded by the Assembly Democrats found that Californians are evenly split between killing high-speed rail or continuing it, but that support for the project is far higher among Democrats, the San Francisco Chronicle reported."
FULL STORY: Bullet train budget battle: Should California spend more on urban transit, not high-speed rail?
How the Trump Presidency Could Impact Urban Planning
An analysis of potential changes in federal housing, transportation, and climate policies.
NACTO Releases Updated Urban Bikeway Guide
The third edition of the nationally recognized road design guide includes detailed design advice for roads that prioritize safety and accessibility for all users.
Research Affirms Safety of ‘Idaho Stop’
Allowing cyclists to treat stop signs as yield signs does not negatively impact safety and can help people on bikes more effectively navigate roadways.
UCLA Experts Offer Critical Support for LA Wildfire Response and Recovery
The UCLA Luskin Center for Innovation offers expert guidance on LA wildfire response and recovery, addressing critical issues like water safety, air quality, equitable rebuilding, and climate adaptation to promote resilience and sustainability.
Salt Lake City to Get Five New Bus Lines
The service improvements come after a year of strong ridership growth.
Fort Worth Relaunches Bike Share Network
The system, operated by Lyft, is made up of primarily e-bikes.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Placer County
Skagit Transit
Berkeley County
Chaddick Institute at DePaul University
HUDs Office of Policy Development and Research
HUDs Office of Policy Development and Research
NYU Wagner Graduate School of Public Service
City of Cambridge, Maryland