California voters, with a reputation for liberal politics, have repeatedly refused to approve statewide rent control laws at the ballot box.
Liam Dillon performs a post-mortem on Proposition 21, a ballot initiative that would have implemented rent control statewide, but failed by a decisive margin to win voters in the state of California.
Proposition 21 was intended to be a more palatable version of Proposition 10, which also failed with California voters in 2018, but the changes weren't enough to win over the state's liberal voting base. As noted by Dillon, neither Proposition 21 nor Proposition 10 would have actually implemented rent control. "Instead, both initiatives would have done away with or changed current statewide prohibitions on most strict versions of rent control, which would have allowed cities and counties to pass their own measures later on," writes Dillon. So, the ballot initiatives would have removed the state preemption on rent control laws, granting cities control to determine their own, tailored version of rent control.
As for why Proposition 21 followed in Proposition 10's footsteps, Dillon collects responses from both supporters and opponents of the proposition for lessons in why rent control is so hard for a liberal state's voters to get behind. Here's Dillon's summary of the political headwinds facing rent control in the state:
Landlord groups significantly outspent the measures’ advocates, allowing the campaigns against the initiatives to hammer home with voters potential problems with rent control. And Democratic politicians and traditionally left-leaning interest groups such as labor unions have been split on the issue. Notably, Gov. Gavin Newsom didn’t support either rent control initiative, arguing this year that Proposition 21 would hurt the supply of affordable housing and detract from already available tenant protections.
According to experts cited in the article, outspending your opponents is a formula for success in the state's ballot initiatives process (see also: Uber, Lyft, and DoorDash's big victory on Proposition 22 during the same election).
But rent control opponents also have research to call on that rent control reduces the market incentives to develop new housing supply, leading to overall decline in affordable housing while protecting affordable housing for some residents.
Dillon also notes that despite these setbacks at the ballot box, the state has legislated new tenant protections in recent years, like a law signed by Gov. Newsom in 2019 that "caps annual rent increases at 5% plus inflation in most rental housing more than 15 years old, a bid to eliminate massive rent hikes that have forced people from their homes," according to Dillon.
Read the full story: Why liberal California keeps saying no to rent control
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
California plans to bury El Niño’s downpour
If the state plays its cards right, it may be able to store a billion acre-feet of El Niño’s water in aquifers.
Chicago breaks ground on $3 billion megadevelopment
The new neighborhood, titled Foundry Park, will one day host 3,700 residences.
California High-Speed Rail Authority CEO resigns after $600,000 scandal
Under Ian Choudri, the authority used taxpayer dollars to fund first class flights and trips to nightclubs.
Want to study the Missouri River? Soon, you may need unanimous approval from 10 states
Legislation would require 10 governors’ permission to study or build projects moving water outside the basin.
Desperate measures: Advocates weigh draining Lake Powell to fill Colorado River
Draining the reservoir could reduce evaporation losses by a couple hundred thousand acre-feet.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
City of Rosemead
Rutgers University, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy
One Hundred Miles
Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY)
The Architects Foundation
University of Cincinnati Online
City of Cambridge
Montrose County
The Pocatello Development Authority