Learn today, plan for tomorrow.
Sign up for news and offers from Planetizen Courses, the online learning platform for planners.
On Tuesday, Jan. 21, a resident of Snohomish County, Wash., returning from Wuhan, China, was confirmed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) as the first known case of the novel coronavirus that would soon be named SARS-CoV-2. On Tuesday, Sept. 22, the first day of fall, the United States recorded over 200,000 deaths, according to the global map of the Johns Hopkins University Coronavirus Resource Center, which showed just over 966,000 deaths.
The United States, with 4.25 percent of global population, accounts for almost 21 percent of world deaths. Brazil is next, with just over 137,000 deaths, followed by India with almost 89,000 deaths.
"The painful milestones have come quickly: 50,000 deaths in April, 100,000 by May, and now 200,000, even as some states, such as Arizona, have shown how quickly both cases and deaths can decline by embracing mitigation efforts," notes The New York Times live update on Sept. 22.
The death toll does not come as a surprise. At a dramatic meeting of the White House Coronavirus Task Force on March 31, with the United States rapidly approaching 4,000 deaths from COVID-19, Dr. Deborah Birx, an Obama-era public health expert who now serves as the coordinator for the task force, displayed a model by the University of Washington's Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) showing 100,000 to 240,000 deaths, assuming full mitigation, i.e., social distancing, mask-wearing, avoiding crowds, and hand hygiene.
"Based on expectations of people’s decreased vigilance in the fall and seasonality, we continue to forecast a major winter surge, leading to 3,000 deaths a day by the end of the year" states their 21-page model update [pdf] for Sept. 23.
By contrast, there were 759 new coronavirus deaths and 42,756 new cases reported in the United States on Sept. 26, according to the New York Times coronavirus tracker. "Over the past week, there have been an average of 42,955 cases per day, an increase of 24 percent from the average two weeks earlier."
A century ago
The 1918 influenza pandemic took a much different track than today's pandemic. In the first six months of that year, 75,000 flu-related deaths were recorded, with the deadly second wave beginning in late August.
The deadliest month, not just of the 1918 pandemic but in all of American history, was in October, writes Jeneen Interlandi, a health, science, and education writer and member of the New York Times editorial board, in an opinion that is also a deep dive (and the source article for this post) on where the country is headed in battling the coronavirus.
In 1918, after waning through the long summer, Spanish flu came roaring back to claim nearly 200,000 lives, just in that one month, just in the United States. Until recently, this second-wave surprise — it was the worst of three to hit the country between 1918 and 1919, most likely because a rare mutation made the virus more deadly — was a bit of obscure medical trivia. But as our current pandemic enters its ninth month, armchair epidemiologists have been wringing their hands over it.
Coronaviruses have little in common with influenza viruses. (For one thing, coronaviruses mutate less frequently, and almost never in ways that make them deadlier). But we’re grasping for comparisons because we are living in a fog right now.
That's just a sample of what Interlandi has to offer. Everyone one of the links included in the article is worth exploring.
As for comparing the two pathogens, "Whatever happens next, it won’t be a second 1918," wrote Dr. Jeremy Brown, author of "Influenza: The Hundred-Year Hunt to Cure the Deadliest Disease in History," on March 3 for The Atlantic.
Related in Planetizen: