A closer look at the numbers reveals stark divides among Toronto neighborhoods.

A new study of Canadian census data shows significant racial and income segregation throughout Toronto. The lowest-income neighborhoods, with average incomes less than $32,000, make up almost half of the city's census tracts, and 68 percent of residents in these neighborhoods are non-white. On the other hand, 23 percent of Toronto's census tracts include neighborhoods with average incomes of $102,000, and two-thirds of these residents are white.
These findings indicate that financial resources give people access to particular neighborhoods. But other issues might also be in play, writes Sandro Contenta:
Choice also partly explains the makeup of low-income neighbourhoods. Some members of ethnic groups prefer to live where their communities are most numerous, giving them easy access to the shops and cultural or religious services that facilitate integration or simply make life more enjoyable.
However, the study also found that half of residents in these neighborhoods have post-secondary degrees, and they say this relatively high percentage of educated residents with low incomes suggests discrimination is playing a role in the disparities. In addition, 57 percent of low-income neighborhoods are made up of immigrants as compared to 31 percent of high-income neighborhoods.
Researchers have pointed to institutional factors that have contributed to the demographic landscape of Toronto:
The polarized income trend dates back to the 1990s, caused by federal and provincial cuts in transfer payments and social assistance, along with tax cuts, rising housing costs and the disappearance of well-paid manufacturing jobs, [researcher David] Hulchanski says.
They argue that government policies are needed to reverse these segregation trends and avoid the sort of social and political conflict seen in European countries.
FULL STORY: Toronto is segregated by race and income. And the numbers are ugly

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

Congressman Proposes Bill to Rename DC Metro “Trump Train”
The Make Autorail Great Again Act would withhold federal funding to the system until the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA), rebrands as the Washington Metropolitan Authority for Greater Access (WMAGA).

The Simple Legislative Tool Transforming Vacant Downtowns
In California, Michigan and Georgia, an easy win is bringing dollars — and delight — back to city centers.

Albuquerque’s Microtransit: A Planner’s Answer to Food Access Gaps
New microtransit vans in Albuquerque aim to close food access gaps by linking low-income areas to grocery stores, cutting travel times by 30 percent and offering planners a scalable model for equity-focused transit.

This City Will Pay You to Meet Your Neighbors
A North Kansas City grant program offers up to $400 for residents to throw neighborhood block parties.

Commentary: Our Silence Will Not Protect Us
Keeping our heads down and our language inoffensive is not the right response to the times we’re in. Solidarity and courage is.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Smith Gee Studio
City of Charlotte
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
City of Astoria
Transportation Research & Education Center (TREC) at Portland State University
US High Speed Rail Association
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
Municipality of Princeton (NJ)