Even after factoring in insurance, parking, depreciation, fuel, repair, maintenance and licensing, urban dwellers would pay half the costs to travel, on average, nearly 11,000 miles annually in their own new car rather than relying on ride-hailing.
"A new study from AAA finds that it can cost city residents twice as much to use ride-hailing services than it would to cover the same mileage in a car they own, even factoring in the cost of fuel, insurance and parking," reports Jason Plautz for Smart Cities Dive.
The study found that it would cost the average city dweller $20,118 a year to rely solely on ride-hailing services, compared to $10,049 a year in a new car including parking costs.
For urban dwellers with access to unpriced parking, "relying on ride-hailing services is nearly three times more expensive than vehicle ownership in these cities," according to the auto association's press release. Cost savings would be even greater by purchasing a used vehicle.
According to data from AAA’s annual Your Driving Costs study, the average annual cost to own and operate a new vehicle, the costliest form of vehicle ownership, is $7,321 for 10,841 miles of travel annually...Depreciation is the single largest expense for vehicle owners. By driving a pre-owned vehicle in good condition, ownership costs are significantly lower
"Whether you own a vehicle or not, ride-hailing services are a convenient transportation option,” said John Nielsen, managing director, Automotive Engineering and Repair. “However, with the average American city-dweller driving nearly 11,000 miles per year, a personal vehicle is still the more cost-effective choice.”
"Notably, the AAA study does not account for driving trips replaced by public transit, which is far cheaper per-mile than ride-hailing and can be used as a replacement for driving, depending on the scope of transit networks in a given city," adds Plautz. Biking, walking, and scooting should also reduce ride-hailing trips.
AAA found that "[o]n average, those using ride-hailing services spent an average of $13.15 per trip, spending 15.11 minutes and traveling 6.66 miles. Ride-hailing costs include the occasional use of rental vehicles for longer distance travel. Full methodology can be found in the study’s fact sheet."
In the "Dive Insight" section, Plautz points to two earlier studies that did not appearentirleyconsistent with the findings from the AAA study:
Writing in The Conversation [October 15, 2017], F. Todd Davidson and Michael E. Webber of the Energy Institute at the University of Texas at Austin calculated that one-quarter of the entire U.S. driving population would be better off relying solely on services like Lyft and Uber, factoring in the value of time spent in traffic
The Kleiner Perkins 2018 Internet Trends Report found that in four of the five largest U.S. cities — New York City, Chicago, Washington, DC and Los Angeles — ride-hailing was cheaper than car ownership, but the reverse was true in Dallas.
Lyft claims that "[i]n 2017 alone, almost a quarter of a million passengers on its platform dropped owning a personal vehicle, due to the availability of ridesharing specifically," according to TechCrunch writer Darrell Etherington.
One of the first studies to "quantify how the uptick in transportation network companies might be affecting consumer behavior" was performed by researchers at the University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, Texas A&M Transportation Institute and Columbia University, reported Nicole Casal Moore for the University of Michigan News on August 10, 2017. The study was unique because it was based on surveys in Austin after the city banned Uber and Lyft in May 2016.
The study found that 41 percent of those surveyed turned to their own vehicle to fill the void left by Uber and Lyft. Nine percent actually bought an additional car for this purpose.
The researchers found a correlation between the level of inconvenience reported and the likelihood that a survey participant would buy a car. Inconvenienced residents were more than five times more likely to buy a car.
The Right to Mobility
As we consider how to decarbonize transportation, preserving mobility, especially for lower- and middle-income people, must be a priority.
Early Sharrow Booster: ‘I Was Wrong’
The lane marking was meant to raise awareness and instill shared respect among drivers and cyclists. But their inefficiency has led supporters to denounce sharrows, pushing instead for more robust bike infrastructure that truly protects riders.
Push and Pull: The Link Between Walkability and Affordability
The increased demand for walkable urban spaces could make them more and more exclusionary if cities don’t pursue policies to limit displacement and boost affordability.
U.S. Transit Agencies Face a Financial Crisis
Transit providers around the country are scrambling to find new sources of revenue to replace lagging ridership and reorienting their systems to a future less dependent on daily commuters.
California Rejects Six-State Colorado River Plan, Proposes Its Own
State officials claim a proposal agreed upon by the other six states using Colorado River water disproportionately impacts California farmers.
Washington Focuses Road Safety Efforts on Individuals, Neglecting Design
Legislative efforts to reduce traffic deaths could move the needle toward Vision Zero, but state leaders failed to commit infrastructure funds to making structural improvements.
HUD's Office of Policy Development and Research
HUD's Office of Policy Development and Research
Harvard GSD Executive Education
City of Culver City
Sonoma County Transportation Authority
City of Piedmont, CA
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.