Parts of rural Texas sound a bit like the outspoken high speed rail opponents in California's Central Valley in their reaction to the Texas Central Railway's bullet train which maintains strong support at the terminal cities of Houston and Dallas.
The Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) has begun holding public scoping meetings on the Texas Central Railway, the nation's second (after California's that began earlier) true, all-electric high speed rail train but is scheduled to be the first to begin operations in 2021. Unlike the San Francisco to Los Angeles bullet train, the Texas train will be privately funded.
Aman Batheja of The Texas Tribune ventures into the Texas countryside, the rural areas between the bookends of Dallas and Houston where the 90-minute ride is largely welcomed as a safer, more relaxed alternative to a four-hour drive.
Unlike the big cities, where the mayors of Dallas, Fort Worth and Houston announced support for the the train in March, "the reception has been less rosy from rural communities that will be on or near a possible train route," writes Batheja. "Officials and residents have expressed concern about the noise from trains whizzing past their quiet towns dozens of times a day and about a track dividing farmland and reducing property values."
I haven't heard anything positive about it whatsoever,” said Byron Ryder, the county judge in Leon County, which is about halfway between Dallas and Houston. “I’ve talked to other judges and commissioners up and down the line, landowners up and down the line. No one wants it.”
Not speaking positive about the bullet train is one thing; getting litigious like the Kings County (Central Valley), Calif. supervisors, et.al is quite another.
At the first meeting held Oct 21 in Dallas, train plans "drew unanimous support for the multibillion-dollar project, but also repeated warnings from residents and local officials that the locations of the stations are vital," wrote Batheja then.
Determining the route is one of the issues that are part of the FRA’s draft environmental impact study (EIS), yet to be posted on the website. "The railroad administration looked at nine potential routes, but has narrowed its focus to two that appear to be least disruptive," writes Batheja who goes on to describe them.
More than 100 miles of the 240-mile corridor would be built on elevated tracks to reduce the impact on communities, said Travis Kelly, Texas Central Railway’s vice president for government relations. He added that the company’s goal was to “use existing rights of way as much as possible in order to minimize the need for access to land.”
Batheja ended on an upbeat note in Grimes County where farmers are concerned that their property could be divided by the tracks and homeowners worried about reduced property values.
"One factor that would weigh heavily, said Betty Shiflett, the county judge, was whether Texas Central Railway followed through on plans to build a station in Grimes County to allow the bullet train to serve nearby College Station, the home of Texas A&M University," he writes.
“I think people would be a lot more enthusiastic because they would probably take it,” Ms. Shiflett said. “I know I would, definitely.”
I doubt you'd hear anything like that from Central Valley, Calif. rail critics.
The FRA scoping meetings appear to be separate from meetings held by TxDOT in the Dallas-Fort Worth region described by the The Dallas Morning News transportation writer Brandon Formby.
The New York Times article is also available in The Texas Tribune.
[Hat tip to Streetsblog's Katie Pearce]
Read the full story: Both Ends Want Bullet Train; It’s Those in Middle Who Object
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
California plans to bury El Niño’s downpour
If the state plays its cards right, it may be able to store a billion acre-feet of El Niño’s water in aquifers.
Chicago breaks ground on $3 billion megadevelopment
The new neighborhood, titled Foundry Park, will one day host 3,700 residences.
California High-Speed Rail Authority CEO resigns after $600,000 scandal
Under Ian Choudri, the authority used taxpayer dollars to fund first class flights and trips to nightclubs.
Want to study the Missouri River? Soon, you may need unanimous approval from 10 states
Legislation would require 10 governors’ permission to study or build projects moving water outside the basin.
Desperate measures: Advocates weigh draining Lake Powell to fill Colorado River
Draining the reservoir could reduce evaporation losses by a couple hundred thousand acre-feet.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
City of Rosemead
Rutgers University, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy
One Hundred Miles
Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY)
The Architects Foundation
University of Cincinnati Online
City of Cambridge
Montrose County
The Pocatello Development Authority