House Appropriations Bills Move the Needle Away from Trump's Agenda

A House of Representatives committee has different ideas about the spending priorities of the federal government when it comes to issues like a proposed border wall and the Great Lakes.

2 minute read

July 12, 2017, 2:00 PM PDT

By James Brasuell @CasualBrasuell


Capitol Hill

Julie Clopper / Shutterstock

News of action from the House Appropriations Committee this week moved forward budgetary considerations for two important infrastructure and environmental spending programs—both with key differences from the ambitions expressed by the very speculative "America First: A Budget Blueprint to Make America Great Again" proposal released by the Trump Administration in May 2017.

First, the "U.S. House Appropriations Committee released legislation today fully funding a Great Lakes restoration program, rejecting a proposal from President Donald Trump to eliminate the $300 million committed each year to the effort," reports Todd Spangler for Detroit Free Press. The legislation is the 2018 Interior and Environment Appropriations bill and it also "restores much of the $2.4 billion proposed to be cut from the budget of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, which had been targeted for a reduction of nearly a third."

Meanwhile, Andrew Taylor reports for the Associated Press that the same committee also released its $44 billion homeland security funding bill on the same day, including $1.6 billion in funding for a proposed wall along the U.S-Mexico border. That bill means Mexico will not be paying for the wall, as President Trump promised many times during the 2016 presidential election.  

As noted by Spangler, the 2018 Interior and Environment Appropriations bill is "one of several that would fund government for the fiscal year beginning Oct. 1," and it "still has to be voted on in committee and passed by the full chamber before being considered in the Senate." For the purposes of the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative, at least, that is good news for its chances of survival.

Tuesday, July 11, 2017 in Detroit Free Press

"Planetizen federal action tracker" logo superimposed over black and white image of US Capitol dome.

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker

A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

November 11, 2026 - Zachary Whalen

A road in north eastern Nebraska with power lines on either side, and grassy fields.

Eastern Nebraska is running out of electricity

Data centers and electrification are straining eastern Nebraska’s grid, throttling economic development.

November 6, 2026 - Grist

People walking and cycling on a street in Boston.

Study reveals best places in the U.S. for cycling, walking

New research from Streetlight Data examines bicycle and pedestrian miles per capita in the 100 largest U.S. cities by population.

November 8, 2026 - Smart Cities Dive

Mamdani speaks behind a podium in a navy suit.

DSA members accuse Mamdani of 'abandoning values' over housing redevelopment

New York City's mayor plans to replace about 2,000 units of public housing with private, mixed-income housing.

November 12 - Gothamist

Streetview of Colorado boulevard, a multi-lane road with trees on either side.

All sides of BRT debate unhappy with CDOT’s most recent move

The Colorado Department of Transportation is no longer considering center-running bus lanes for Colorado Boulevard.

November 12 - 9 News

Solar panels above a cranberry boy, with workers collecting berries.

Massachusetts bogs generate both power, and cranberries

Putting solar panels above farmland is one way Massachusetts is advancing toward its goal of net-zero carbon emissions by 2050.

November 12 - Grist

FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?

After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.

Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold

The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.