Protecting the Lungs of Children by Improving School Location

With the national spotlight rightfully focused on the irreversible effects of lead in the drinking water of Flint, Michigan, another insidious threat remains: motor vehicle emissions affecting children's lungs.
February 1, 2016, 8am PST | Irvin Dawid
Share Tweet LinkedIn Email Comments

Six million children attending 17,000 schools "fail" the proper siting test, potentially exposing the developing lungs of children to the damaging emissions from motor vehicles.

Ruth EtzelMD. writes about a new "best practices" document released by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, with collaboration from the South Coast Air Quality Management District and the Southern California Clean, Green, and Healthy Schools (a state-sponsored, pilot project partnership) for the preferred placement of schools and implementation of strategies to reduce air pollution at schools.

Proximity to exposure from motor vehicle emissions is a key consideration for protecting children from the damaging effects of air pollution that include "asthma, reduced lung function, and impaired lung development."

[A 2007] study by researchers at the University of Southern California [USC] found that children who live within 500 meters (that’s about one-third of a mile) from a freeway incur substantial and long-lasting deficits in lung development and function compared to children living at least 1500 meters (a little under 1 mile) from a freeway.

So, how many schools "fail" the siting test? "(N)early 17,000 of our country’s schools are located within steps of a heavily-traveled road, potentially exposing more than 6 million children to traffic-related pollution at a time when their developing lungs are particularly vulnerable to the harmful effects of air pollution," writes Etzel.

What’s more, low-income and minority children are disproportionately impacted by asthma and are more likely to live and attend school near major roadways.

It's not just a matter of where to place schools. Other strategies can be considered to mitigate the effects of vehicular emissions, of particular importance to "schools [already] located downwind from heavily traveled roadways (such as highways), along corridors with significant trucking traffic, or near other traffic or vehicular pollution sources."

This publication [22-page PDF] can help school communities identify strategies for reducing traffic-related pollution exposure at schools [...]. Many of these strategies are already being used by schools across the country to reduce exposures to traffic-related air pollution. 

According to Etzel, these strategies can include "ventilation, filtration, school transportation policies, and the use of sound walls and vegetative barriers."

The payoffs of cleaner air resulting in stronger lungs of children was reported last March in a Planetizen post, "'Good News' Air Pollution Study," also written by USC, "one of the largest and most detailed studies of the long-term effects of air pollution on the respiratory health of children.

The pollution reductions were largely due to regulations on the federal level by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), state level by the California Air Resources Board (CARB) and on the regional level by the South Coast Air Quality Management District

While proximity to heavily traveled roads, particularly those carrying heavy-duty trucks belching diesel emissions, is of extreme importance to the physical health of children, other issues to consider include proximity to the center of the community, particularly within walking distance of many homes.

Hat tip: Becky English, Sierra Club California

Full Story:
Published on Tuesday, January 26, 2016 in EPA Connect
Share Tweet LinkedIn Email