Swatting down untruths and misinformation by bike lane opponents in St. Paul doesn't require a PhD, but it helps.

Writing in BeyondChron, Bill Lindeke sets the record straight on a few points used by bike lane opponents as St. Paul expands its bicycle path network through the city. Lindeke, a St. Paul Planning Commissioner who has a PhD in geography and bicycle planning, writes about his frustration at flyers given to neighbors along Cleveland Avenue, where opponents have stepped up efforts to block a bike lane on the street that would result in the loss of or shift of some street parking to side streets.
If you believe that your career depends on a parking space, there’s no amount of research, argument, or kindness that will convince you that a bike lane might benefit Cleveland Avenue.
And to make a long story short, this flier represents a dishonest argument about street design that appeals to those invested in the status quo. On the surface, these objections might seem reasonable. But they actually reflect how inflexibility about street design and urban transportation, in order to cling to slight comforts, keeps a dangerous precedent in place for another decade.
Opponents have cited the proposed reduction of driving lane widths on Cleveland from 12 feet to 11 feet as creating a dangerous situation, although as Lindeke points out, just the opposite is true. Statistics show that in the urban environment wider lanes are more dangerous than narrower lanes.
Opponents are also asking that the route be entirely "off-street" for safety reasons, or else the entire thing should be scrapped. Lindeke notes that "smart cities build infrastructure for the whole range of bicyclists and allow them to choose where and how quickly they want to ride… it turns into a spectrum of bicycle infrastructure." Asking for perfection or nothing is just another tool of opponents to block bicycle lane development, Lindeke argues.
FULL STORY: Two Anti-Bike Lane Narratives that Need to Stop

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

USGS Water Science Centers Targeted for Closure
If their work is suspended, states could lose a valuable resource for monitoring, understanding, and managing water resources.

Congress Moves to End Reconnecting Communities and Related Grants
The House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee moved to rescind funding for the Neighborhood Equity and Access program, which funds highway removals, freeway caps, transit projects, pedestrian infrastructure, and more.

Expanding Access to Design Education at Honolulu Community College
Honolulu Community College’s Architecture, Engineering & Construction Technologies program highlights the role of community colleges in preparing nontraditional students for careers in architectural and construction technologies.

Integrating Human Rights Into Energy and Extractive Sector Transitions
Why just transition efforts must move beyond economic considerations by embedding human rights principles into business practices to ensure equitable, transparent, and accountable outcomes for affected communities and workers.

Blocked, Restored, Blocked Again — Housing Funds in Legal Limbo
Since Trump took office, the administration has blocked multiple affordable housing funding streams. Here's a look at which funds have been frozen, which have been reinstated, and which are in the courts.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
City of Moorpark
City of Tustin
Tyler Technologies
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
City of Astoria
Transportation Research & Education Center (TREC) at Portland State University
Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada
Toledo-Lucas County Plan Commissions