Who Will Win the Carbon Neutral Economy?

The fossil fuel industry has convinced the public that aggressive carbon reduction will harm the economy. Au contraire. The carbon reduction leader will secure its place at the top of the global economy, argues UrbDeZine Editor Bill Adams.

2 minute read

March 11, 2015, 6:00 AM PDT

By wadams92101


Somethings, in hindsight, are obvious, though not so much before. The beneficial impact on the economy of reducing carbon will be the next such thing, opines Bill Adams, a San Diego land use attorney and editor of UrbDeZine. The fossil fuel industry has managed to convince the country that the harm to their interests from conversion to clean energy will be a sacrifice shared by all. In fact, opines Adams, conversion to carbon neutral energy is inevitable. It is inevitable because the alternative is catastrophic for the planet. And because it is inevitable, so is conversion to carbon neutral energy sources.  

Accordingly, the boom in carbon reduction technology is inevitable—it has already begun but will continue to grow exponentially. Thus, failing to act quickly and robustly in supporting carbon neutral technology will cause the United States to miss the opportunity to fully share in the economic benefits that will be bestowed on the technological leaders of the inevitable conversion. Adams asserts: 

While the U.S. is still one of the top investors in carbon neutral energy, China is number one. Coupled with it’s manufacturing prowess, China stands poised to make the U.S. a customer rather than a producer or patent holder, while congress and state legislators do the bidding of the fossil fuel industry. Even some fossil fuel companies recognize the inevitability of addressing climate change, albeit in a Machiavellian manner: For example, ExxonMobile is promoting and investing in geo-engineering the climate by pumping sulfate aerosols into the atmosphere, at the same time it funds climate change skepticism. However, geo-engineering is widely considered a far more risky and inferior way to deal with climate change than carbon reduction. Thus, ExxonMobile hopes to profit by sinking the ship while owning the lifeboats.

Adams concludes: 

This battle between Old and New, is not greens vs. greenbacks. It’s greens and new greenbacks, on the one side vs. old greenbacks, on the other side. The earth and economic growth are on the same side.

Sunday, March 8, 2015 in UrbDeZine

"Planetizen federal action tracker" logo superimposed over black and white image of US Capitol dome.

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker

A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

October 28, 2026 - Zachary Whalen

A car drives through a puddle, making a large splash. Rain pours down.

California plans to bury El Niño’s downpour

If the state plays its cards right, it may be able to store a billion acre-feet of El Niño’s water in aquifers.

October 28, 2026 - Grist

Lake Powell with much of the water evaporated.

Desperate measures: Advocates weigh draining Lake Powell to fill Colorado River

Draining the reservoir could reduce evaporation losses by a couple hundred thousand acre-feet.

October 30, 2026 - Yale Environment 360

People vote in Chicago behind blue privacy screens

Chicago voters approve permanent festival grounds, penalty for vacant property owners

Currently, major summer and fall festivals take over public parks for weeks at a time, drawing criticism from nearby residents

November 5 - Block Club Chicago

Mayor Zohran Mamdani speaks into a microphone. He wears a gray suit.

NYC votes to cut outdoor dining red tape, speed up permitting

New York City also voted to allow the Department of Transportation to begin work on urgent projects before notifying elected officials.

November 5 - The City Reporter

People in Los Angeles going to the polls, following a sign with an "I Voted" design

California appears to reject Prop. 45

The proposition would have expanded the projects that qualify for a streamlined environmental review, effectively paring down the California Environmental Quality Act.

November 5 - Cal Matters