Palo Alto Stalls on Controversial Measure to Cap Commercial Development

In some places, it might be hard to imagine even considering a cap on the development of commercial development. Palo Alto, home to Stanford University and a hot bed of California's tech industry, did just that in City Council earlier this week.

1 minute read

March 4, 2015, 10:00 AM PST

By James Brasuell @CasualBrasuell


"Palo Alto's polarizing debate over office growth hit a stalemate Monday night when a deeply divided City Council agonized over the topic for more than four hours before deciding not to move ahead with any dramatic development restrictions just yet," reports Gennady Sheynar.

The proposal would cap commercial development in the city at an annual limit of 35,000 to 50,000 square feet of new office space every year. The motivation behind the law, naturally, concerns parking and traffic. The cap would be added to an update of the city's Comprehensive Plan.

Opponents of the plan, which include several councilmembers and the city's Chamber of Commerce, "urged the council not to move ahead with a building restriction, which they argued would threaten downtown's vitality without achieving anything useful," according to Sheynar.

"[Palo Alto City Councilmember Marc] Berman ticked off a list of initiatives that the city is already pursuing to address these issues, which include a new downtown Residential Parking Permit Program that would restrict the amount of time employees can park in residential areas; a new Transportation Management Association that would offer businesses incentives to switch from cars to other modes of transportation; and an expansion of the city's shuttle system."

The Peninsula Transportation Alternatives blog and Nathan Donato-Weinstein also provided coverage of the proposal in the days leading up to Monday's hearing.

Wednesday, March 4, 2015 in Palo Alto Weekly

"Planetizen federal action tracker" logo superimposed over black and white image of US Capitol dome.

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker

A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

October 28, 2026 - Zachary Whalen

A car drives through a puddle, making a large splash. Rain pours down.

California plans to bury El Niño’s downpour

If the state plays its cards right, it may be able to store a billion acre-feet of El Niño’s water in aquifers.

October 28, 2026 - Grist

Lake Powell with much of the water evaporated.

Desperate measures: Advocates weigh draining Lake Powell to fill Colorado River

Draining the reservoir could reduce evaporation losses by a couple hundred thousand acre-feet.

October 30, 2026 - Yale Environment 360

Nilu Jenks wears a long gray coat and speaks with one man and two women outside.

Housing is the top priority of Seattle’s sole new councilmember

Jenks campaigned on building 1,000 new units of affordable housing.

November 8 - Reason

People sit on wooden benches on a bus in Miami

New tax cuts may slash $1.5 billion in funding for Miami transit, public parks

Amendment 3 will save Miami-Dade homeowners $2,700 in 2028.

November 8 - Miami New Times

Two men install solar panels on the roof of a house.

Arizona, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania hope to finally advance climate goals post-midterms

The three states have spent years under Republican or divided control.

November 8 - Grist

FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?

After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.

Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold

The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.