A long development saga has finally concluded in the South Bay Area city of Palo Alto, following a common narrative in the development resistant city.

"When a nonprofit housing developer won approval several years ago to build 60 apartments for low-income seniors in Palo Alto, neighbors revolted," writes Louis Hansen to introduce a development saga that included a citywide referendum and recently ended in a much different final form.
"Now, the long-awaited aftermath of that referendum has emerged: the first batch of 16 new single family homes are on sale, starting at around $5 million, each with about 4,000 square feet of space for home gyms, theaters, offices, pergola-covered patios and multi-car garages with electric vehicle charging ports," reports Hansen.
The development, previously known as Barron Park, was killed by the referendum. The new development, known as Orchard Park, also had to be cut in half to make it past city staff and local residents.
According to the article, this isn't the first time Palo Alto has rejected a proposal for affordable housing units to be developed in the city. "Silicon Valley cities have widely and prodigiously failed to meet state goals for affordable housing," writes Hanson. "Palo Alto is near the bottom of the pack, providing just 6 percent of its target for very low income housing, and 13 percent of its low income housing in the most recent development period."
State legislators have passed laws in recent years designed to prevent local opponents from blocking projects. Previous Planetizen reporting on the legal battles that have tested the legal limits of the new laws can be found in the links below:
- Are Charter Cities Subject to California's Housing Laws? (January 24, 2020)
- Housing Litigation by California Attorney General Yields Results (January 27, 2020)
- Developer Sues L.A. After Area Planning Commissioners Reject Multi-Family Project (February 24, 2020)
- Controversial Development Site in Cupertino Compounds Legal Controversy (February 26, 2020)
FULL STORY: Fierce, 7-year NIMBY battle in Palo Alto reaches a luxury conclusion

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

Congressman Proposes Bill to Rename DC Metro “Trump Train”
The Make Autorail Great Again Act would withhold federal funding to the system until the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA), rebrands as the Washington Metropolitan Authority for Greater Access (WMAGA).

The Simple Legislative Tool Transforming Vacant Downtowns
In California, Michigan and Georgia, an easy win is bringing dollars — and delight — back to city centers.

The States Losing Rural Delivery Rooms at an Alarming Pace
In some states, as few as 9% of rural hospitals still deliver babies. As a result, rising pre-term births, no adequate pre-term care and harrowing close calls are a growing reality.

The Small South Asian Republic Going all in on EVs
Thanks to one simple policy change less than five years ago, 65% of new cars in this Himalayan country are now electric.

DC Backpedals on Bike Lane Protection, Swaps Barriers for Paint
Citing aesthetic concerns, the city is removing the concrete barriers and flexposts that once separated Arizona Avenue cyclists from motor vehicles.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Smith Gee Studio
City of Charlotte
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
City of Astoria
Transportation Research & Education Center (TREC) at Portland State University
US High Speed Rail Association
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
Municipality of Princeton (NJ)