A couple of questions are fundamental to the debate about the housing affordability crisis.
[Updated: August 19, 2019]
An article by Solomon Greene raises the question of whether deregulation can solve the affordable housing crisis, and, more specifically, whether the federal government can play a hand in that deregulation.
The Trump administration is making at least initial gestures toward trying to do just that. In June, President Donald Trump signed an executive order establishing the "White House Council on Eliminating Regulatory Barriers to Affordable Housing." Democratic candidates for president are also pushing for fewer regulations as one tool for combating the rising costs of housing. The New York Times Editorial Board yesterday announced its support published an editorial supporting the idea of more construction as one potential solution to housing affordability.
"This embrace of deregulation merits particular praise because the states most resistant to allowing housing construction are the strongholds of the Democratic Party, in the Northeast and along the Pacific Coast, and the most resistant voters are the wealthy residents of those states who provide so much of the funding for Democratic presidential campaigns," according to the editorial.
Returning to the earlier article, Solomon builds a case that the federal government has multiple avenues by which it can influence the housing market, including subsidies, ending or prohibiting exclusionary barriers, identifying the helpful regulations among the harmful, and supporting bottom-up initiatives. On that last point, Solomon writes:
Effective policies will also require a strong emphasis on community engagement from the outset, and ongoing monitoring of implementation and evaluation of outcomes. The federal government used this model under the Sustainable Communities Initiative and began to apply it more broadly through the US Department of Housing and Urban Development’s Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing rule before Secretary Carson suspended its implementation. Mining lessons from each of these efforts will be key to the success of new initiatives.
Read the full story: Can We Deregulate Ourselves out of the Affordable Housing Crisis?
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
California plans to bury El Niño’s downpour
If the state plays its cards right, it may be able to store a billion acre-feet of El Niño’s water in aquifers.
Chicago breaks ground on $3 billion megadevelopment
The new neighborhood, titled Foundry Park, will one day host 3,700 residences.
California High-Speed Rail Authority CEO resigns after $600,000 scandal
Under Ian Choudri, the authority used taxpayer dollars to fund first class flights and trips to nightclubs.
Want to study the Missouri River? Soon, you may need unanimous approval from 10 states
Legislation would require 10 governors’ permission to study or build projects moving water outside the basin.
Desperate measures: Advocates weigh draining Lake Powell to fill Colorado River
Draining the reservoir could reduce evaporation losses by a couple hundred thousand acre-feet.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
City of Rosemead
Rutgers University, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy
One Hundred Miles
Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY)
The Architects Foundation
University of Cincinnati Online
City of Cambridge
Montrose County
The Pocatello Development Authority