A couple of questions are fundamental to the debate about the housing affordability crisis.
[Updated: August 19, 2019]
An article by Solomon Greene raises the question of whether deregulation can solve the affordable housing crisis, and, more specifically, whether the federal government can play a hand in that deregulation.
The Trump administration is making at least initial gestures toward trying to do just that. In June, President Donald Trump signed an executive order establishing the "White House Council on Eliminating Regulatory Barriers to Affordable Housing." Democratic candidates for president are also pushing for fewer regulations as one tool for combating the rising costs of housing. The New York Times Editorial Board yesterday announced its support published an editorial supporting the idea of more construction as one potential solution to housing affordability.
"This embrace of deregulation merits particular praise because the states most resistant to allowing housing construction are the strongholds of the Democratic Party, in the Northeast and along the Pacific Coast, and the most resistant voters are the wealthy residents of those states who provide so much of the funding for Democratic presidential campaigns," according to the editorial.
Returning to the earlier article, Solomon builds a case that the federal government has multiple avenues by which it can influence the housing market, including subsidies, ending or prohibiting exclusionary barriers, identifying the helpful regulations among the harmful, and supporting bottom-up initiatives. On that last point, Solomon writes:
Effective policies will also require a strong emphasis on community engagement from the outset, and ongoing monitoring of implementation and evaluation of outcomes. The federal government used this model under the Sustainable Communities Initiative and began to apply it more broadly through the US Department of Housing and Urban Development’s Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing rule before Secretary Carson suspended its implementation. Mining lessons from each of these efforts will be key to the success of new initiatives.
FULL STORY: Can We Deregulate Ourselves out of the Affordable Housing Crisis?
The state-sanctioned urbicide of Austin
People don’t kill cities. Freeways do.
US to reduce Colorado River water deliveries to Mexico
A new Colorado Treaty amendment reduces Mexico’s Colorado River water allocation by 250,000 acre feet.
New Jersey’s second-largest city bans standalone data centers
Jersey City will continue to allow co-location facilities, such as those meant for research institutions that store their own data.
Amtrak not solely to blame for New Jersey commuter rail's unreliability, report finds
A new study from the Garden State Initiative found that NJ Transit’s budget grew 20% across a 4 year period, but reliability declined significantly over the same period.
EPA erases limits on planet-warming pollution from power plants
Under Monday’s plan, power plants would still have some limits on how much mercury, arsenic and other contaminants they can emit.
Phoenix announces new on-demand transit service, more frequent RAPID buses
Both new services will launch in October, and are part of Phoenix's Project Effective Access Solutions for Easing Congestion.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
Eagle County Government
Harvard University Graduate School of Design
Nashville Planning Department
The Architects Foundation
University of Cincinnati Online
The Pocatello Development Authority
The Urban Renewal Agency of the City of Pocatello
Journal of the American Planning Association