If there's a solid take-away from the California Field Poll, it is not to ask residents how they feel about raising gas taxes, or any one option for that matter. Rather, offer a menu of funding alternatives and the results become more meaningful.
California residents overwhelmingly agree that "state and local officials should dedicate additional resources to existing roadways," writes Christopher Cadelago, political reporter in The Sacramento Bee's Capitol Bureau about the Field Poll telephone survey results [PDF] released Friday on state transportation funding options. How to pay for it—now that's the $59 billion question. No surprise there.
A Field Poll asked California motorists about three funding options to pay for road infrastructure:
- 10-cent increase in the gas tax: 49 percent support
- Build more toll roads: 38 percent support
- Pay by the mile traveled: 30 percent support
When presented this way, gas tax increases are clearly more palatable than the other alternatives presented. Pie charts created by The Sacramento Bee show the results more clearly and comprehensively.
The results contrast sharply with a 2011 Rockefeller Foundation poll (posted here) on the same funding options but asked nationwide. Either Californians differ remarkably for other U.S. residents, or attitudes have changed rather dramatically in four years, or a combination of the two:
- 71 percent opposed a gas tax increase,
- 64 percent were against new tolls on existing roads and bridges, and
- 58 percent said no to paying for each mile they drive.
Another question dealt with whether to fund existing roads vs. building new ones: 71 percent support existing while 48 percent favored new roads.
Unfortunately, currently no gas tax legislation appears to be in the works in the Golden State, and February 27 was the deadline to introduce bills. This correspondent did not even see Assembly Speaker Atkin's much touted $50 annual flat fee in bill form.
With 49 percent of respondents supporting a 10-cent increase, it wold seem not a huge ask of legislators to simply maintain the existing 36-cent gas tax that is set to decrease by six-cents on July 1 due to the February 24 vote by the Board of Equalization.
FULL STORY: Californians sharply divided over hiking state gas tax

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

DARTSpace Platform Streamlines Dallas TOD Application Process
The Dallas transit agency hopes a shorter permitting timeline will boost transit-oriented development around rail stations.

Congressman Proposes Bill to Rename DC Metro “Trump Train”
The Make Autorail Great Again Act would withhold federal funding to the system until the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA), rebrands as the Washington Metropolitan Authority for Greater Access (WMAGA).

Supreme Court Ruling in Pipeline Case Guts Federal Environmental Law
The decision limits the scope of a federal law that mandates extensive environmental impact reviews of energy, infrastructure, and transportation projects.

Texas State Bills to Defund Dallas Transit Die
DART would have seen a 30% service cut, $230M annual losses had the bills survived.

Bikeshare for the Win: Team Pedals to London Cricket Match, Beats Rivals Stuck in Traffic
While their opponents sat in gridlock, England's national cricket team hopped Lime bikes, riding to a 3-0 victory.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Roanoke Valley-Alleghany Regional Commission
City of Mt Shasta
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
City of Astoria
Transportation Research & Education Center (TREC) at Portland State University
US High Speed Rail Association
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
Municipality of Princeton (NJ)