If there's a solid take-away from the California Field Poll, it is not to ask residents how they feel about raising gas taxes, or any one option for that matter. Rather, offer a menu of funding alternatives and the results become more meaningful.
California residents overwhelmingly agree that "state and local officials should dedicate additional resources to existing roadways," writes Christopher Cadelago, political reporter in The Sacramento Bee's Capitol Bureau about the Field Poll telephone survey results [PDF] released Friday on state transportation funding options. How to pay for it—now that's the $59 billion question. No surprise there.
A Field Poll asked California motorists about three funding options to pay for road infrastructure:
- 10-cent increase in the gas tax: 49 percent support
- Build more toll roads: 38 percent support
- Pay by the mile traveled: 30 percent support
When presented this way, gas tax increases are clearly more palatable than the other alternatives presented. Pie charts created by The Sacramento Bee show the results more clearly and comprehensively.
The results contrast sharply with a 2011 Rockefeller Foundation poll (posted here) on the same funding options but asked nationwide. Either Californians differ remarkably for other U.S. residents, or attitudes have changed rather dramatically in four years, or a combination of the two:
- 71 percent opposed a gas tax increase,
- 64 percent were against new tolls on existing roads and bridges, and
- 58 percent said no to paying for each mile they drive.
Another question dealt with whether to fund existing roads vs. building new ones: 71 percent support existing while 48 percent favored new roads.
Unfortunately, currently no gas tax legislation appears to be in the works in the Golden State, and February 27 was the deadline to introduce bills. This correspondent did not even see Assembly Speaker Atkin's much touted $50 annual flat fee in bill form.
With 49 percent of respondents supporting a 10-cent increase, it wold seem not a huge ask of legislators to simply maintain the existing 36-cent gas tax that is set to decrease by six-cents on July 1 due to the February 24 vote by the Board of Equalization.
Read the full story: Californians sharply divided over hiking state gas tax
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
California plans to bury El Niño’s downpour
If the state plays its cards right, it may be able to store a billion acre-feet of El Niño’s water in aquifers.
Desperate measures: Advocates weigh draining Lake Powell to fill Colorado River
Draining the reservoir could reduce evaporation losses by a couple hundred thousand acre-feet.
Chicago voters approve permanent festival grounds, penalty for vacant property owners
Currently, major summer and fall festivals take over public parks for weeks at a time, drawing criticism from nearby residents
NYC votes to cut outdoor dining red tape, speed up permitting
New York City also voted to allow the Department of Transportation to begin work on urgent projects before notifying elected officials.
California appears to reject Prop. 45
The proposition would have expanded the projects that qualify for a streamlined environmental review, effectively paring down the California Environmental Quality Act.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
City of Rosemead
Rutgers University, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy
One Hundred Miles
Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY)
The Architects Foundation
University of Cincinnati Online
City of Cambridge
Montrose County
The Pocatello Development Authority