With a final decision expected later this year, the California Public Utilities Commission recommended a $1.4 billion fine for PG&E in connection with violations leading to a natural gas explosion in 2010.
"State regulators on Tuesday proposed a $1.4 billion fine to punish PG&E for its role in a fatal natural gas explosion in San Bruno -- but the fines are far less than the $2.25 billion recommended by regulatory staff and consumer groups," reports George Avalos.
Two administrative law judges with the state Public Utilities Commission (PUC) recommended the fine. If finalized, the fine would be the largest safety related penalty ever issued by the PUC.
The PUC's Office of Ratepayer Advocates pushed for a much larger fine of $2.25 billion. If there is any indication that the lower penalty was good news for PG&E, the market provided one: "Shares of PG&E soared 3.5 percent soon after word spread of the proposed decision and spiked an intra-day high of $47.78 in late-session trades. PG&E closed at $47.29 on Tuesday, up 1.7 percent."
As for the negligence that precipitated the explosion in San Bruno, which killed eight people and destroyed 38 homes, "San Francisco-based PG&E committed about 3,800 violations of state and federal laws and regulations in connection with its natural gas operations, and because the infractions stretched back a period of years, the utility was in violation for a total of 18.4 million days, the proposed decision determined."
Read the full story: PG&E to be fined $1.4 billion for San Bruno explosion
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
California plans to bury El Niño’s downpour
If the state plays its cards right, it may be able to store a billion acre-feet of El Niño’s water in aquifers.
Desperate measures: Advocates weigh draining Lake Powell to fill Colorado River
Draining the reservoir could reduce evaporation losses by a couple hundred thousand acre-feet.
Chicago voters approve permanent festival grounds, penalty for vacant property owners
Currently, major summer and fall festivals take over public parks for weeks at a time, drawing criticism from nearby residents
NYC votes to cut outdoor dining red tape, speed up permitting
New York City also voted to allow the Department of Transportation to begin work on urgent projects before notifying elected officials.
California appears to reject Prop. 45
The proposition would have expanded the projects that qualify for a streamlined environmental review, effectively paring down the California Environmental Quality Act.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
City of Rosemead
Rutgers University, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy
One Hundred Miles
Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY)
The Architects Foundation
University of Cincinnati Online
City of Cambridge
Montrose County
The Pocatello Development Authority