It could be as low as nine cents per gallon, or as high as 76 cents, writes UC Berkeley energy expert Severin Borenstein. On January 1, transportation fuels are included under California's landmark cap and trade program.
As noted last month, legislators opposed to the inclusion of transportation fuels have launched a campaign, complete with legislation, to delay it for three years. Borenstein bemoans that campaign, viewing it as "spin over how much gas prices will go up." His comprehensive article in Green Tech Media is his "attempt at de-spinning."
But first, why is this such an important issue? Is this just a debate about how much one can realistically expect "the cap" will add to gas prices, or is there something bigger at stake?
"There is a real policy debate here about how and when California should reduce its greenhouse gas emissions, 38 percent of which come from transportation," writes Borenstein. "I share (UC-Davis economics professor James Bushnell's) view that this is a moment of truth in which California needs to show it will really step up to reduce GHGs," he adds.
Interesting, the spinning is not just being done by industry, which suggests "a price impact of 16 cents to 76 cents." Even the California Air Resources Board (ARB) knows how to play the game, writes Borenstein.
The ARB and some other supporters of fuels under the cap have responded with their own inaccuracies, saying that including fuels in the program needn’t raise gas prices at all and suggesting that any increase is the fault of oil companies.
Borenstein states that based on his review of economic literature, it's "almost certain outcome is that within a few days after January 1, 2015, the cap-and-trade program will cause the price of gasoline in California to increase by 9 cents to 10 cents, a margin that is lower than the drop in gas prices that has occurred over the last few weeks."
The leader of the movement to delay the program for gas and diesel fuel is Assemblyman Henry T. Perea (D-Fresno) who has an opinion published in the San Francisco Chronicle on August 12 explaining his position.
FULL STORY: How Much Will Cap and Trade Raise the Price of a Gallon of Gas in California?

Maui's Vacation Rental Debate Turns Ugly
Verbal attacks, misinformation campaigns and fistfights plague a high-stakes debate to convert thousands of vacation rentals into long-term housing.

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

In Urban Planning, AI Prompting Could be the New Design Thinking
Creativity has long been key to great urban design. What if we see AI as our new creative partner?

King County Supportive Housing Program Offers Hope for Unhoused Residents
The county is taking a ‘Housing First’ approach that prioritizes getting people into housing, then offering wraparound supportive services.

Researchers Use AI to Get Clearer Picture of US Housing
Analysts are using artificial intelligence to supercharge their research by allowing them to comb through data faster. Though these AI tools can be error prone, they save time and housing researchers are optimistic about the future.

Making Shared Micromobility More Inclusive
Cities and shared mobility system operators can do more to include people with disabilities in planning and operations, per a new report.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
planning NEXT
Appalachian Highlands Housing Partners
Mpact (founded as Rail~Volution)
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
City of Astoria
City of Portland
City of Laramie